ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020
Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Allostatic Load on Overall Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data: The Role of Healthcare Quality, Mistrust, and Discrimination Across Race-Gender Identities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Endometrial cancer therapy in 2026.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2026Review
- The Diverse Aspects of Uterine Serous Cancer: an NCI workshop on the status of and opportunities for advancement of research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Article
- Geographic Variation of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Uterine Cancer Survival.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Quality of Treatment Selection for Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- The Financial Impact of Post Intensive Care Syndrome.Critical care clinics · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review of the Clinical, Humanistic, and Economic Value of Pembrolizumab-Based Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.Oncology and therapy · 2024Review
- Endometrial cancer survival in populations of African descent.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Racial disparities in the treatment of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in postmenopausal women.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Equity-Centered Postdischarge Support for Medicaid-Insured People: Protocol for a Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Review
- Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Approaches to developing de novo cancer population models to examine questions about cancer and race in bladder, gastric, and endometrial cancer and multiple myeloma: the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network incubator program.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023Article
- Racial Disparities in Brachytherapy Treatment among Women with Cervical and Endometrial Cancer in the United States.Cancers · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence for prediction of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and endometrial cancer risks in pre- and postmenopausal women.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Patterns and trends in the cause of death for patients with endometrial cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in type II endometrial cancer mortality outcomes: The contribution of sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality.
objectiveUsing the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival. STUDY
designWe defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity.
resultsThis analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women.
conclusionNon-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.