Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142818›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes2020

Two small, cysteine-rich and cationic antifungal proteins from Penicillium chrysogenum: A comparative study of PAF and PAFB.

A Huber, L Galgóczy, G Váradi, J Holzknecht, A Kakar, N Malanovic, R Leber, J Koch, M A Keller, G Batta and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Morphotype-specific susceptibility toMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Two-Step Engineering of Food-GradeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Biocontrol and Growth-Promoting Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. TheMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TheJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A HuberInstitute of Molecular Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
L GalgóczyInstitute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
G VáradiDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
J HolzknechtInstitute of Molecular Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
A KakarInstitute of Molecular Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
N MalanovicInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Biophysics Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
R LeberInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Biophysics Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
J KochInstitute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
M A KellerInstitute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
G BattaDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
G K TóthDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; MTA-SZTE Biomimetic Systems Research Group, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
F MarxInstitute of Molecular Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: florentine.marx@i-med.ac.at.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Szeged · HUInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The filamentous fungus Penicillium chrysogenum Q176 secretes the antimicrobial proteins (AMPs) PAF and PAFB, which share a compact disulfide-bond mediated, β-fold structure rendering them highly stable. These two AMPs effectively inhibit the growth of human pathogenic fungi in micromolar concentrations and exhibit antiviral potential without causing cytotoxic effects on mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. The antifungal mechanism of action of both AMPs is closely linked to - but not solely dependent on - the lipid composition of the fungal cell membrane and requires a strictly regulated protein uptake into the cell, indicating that PAF and PAFB are not canonical membrane active proteins. Variations in their antifungal spectrum and their killing dynamics point towards a divergent mode of action related to their physicochemical properties and surface charge distribution. In this review, we relate characteristic features of PAF and PAFB to the current knowledge about other AMPs of different sources. In addition, we present original data that have never been published before to substantiate our assumptions and provide evidences that help to explain and understand better the mechanistic function of PAF and PAFB. Finally, we underline the promising potential of PAF and PAFB as future antifungal therapeutics.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesApoptosisCell MembraneCysteineFungal ProteinsHumansMembrane LipidsMycosesPenicillium chrysogenumAntifungal AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCysteineFungal ProteinsMembrane LipidsPAF protein, Penicillium chrysogenumAntimicrobial proteins and peptidesApoptosisEndocytosisFungal membrane lipidsPenicillium chrysogenumβ-Fold structureγ-Core

Identifiers

PMID32142818
PMCPMC7138148
OpenAlexW3010410663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.