ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020
Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dynamic vibration-driven feedback shapes predator-prey interactions in an orb-weaving spider.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Centralized brain networks controlling antennal grooming coordination.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Segmentally repeated ventral nerve cord circuits drive different leg rubbing behaviors iniScience · 2026Article
- DANCE provides an open-source and low-cost approach to quantify aggression and courtship ineLife · 2025Article
- Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding and courting in Drosophila show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- A method for mechanically blocking antennal joints in Drosophila.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Mechanosensory and command contributions to the Drosophila grooming sequence.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Altered Grooming Cycles in Transgenic Drosophila.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- Heightened sensitivity in high-grooming honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence ineLife · 2024Article
- Cross-talk between immunity and behavior: insights from entomopathogenic fungi and their insect hosts.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Mechanosensory and command contributions to thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Persistent modulatory actions and task switching in the feeding network of Aplysia.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2023Review
- A leaky integrate-and-fire computational model based on the connectome of the entire adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Octopamine signaling via OctαR is essential for a well-orchestrated climbing performance of adult Drosophila melanogaster.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A pair of commissural command neurons inducesiScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals integrate information from different sensory modalities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice, but the relevant sensory comparisons and the underlying neural circuits are still largely unknown. We use the grooming behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as a model to investigate the sensory comparisons that govern a motor sequence. Flies perform grooming movements spontaneously, but when covered with dust, they clean their bodies following an anterior-to-posterior sequence. After investigating different sensory modalities that could detect dust, we focus on mechanosensory bristle neurons, whose optogenetic activation induces a similar sequence. Computational modeling predicts that higher sensory input strength to the head will cause anterior grooming to occur first. We test this prediction using an optogenetic competition assay whereby two targeted light beams independently activate mechanosensory bristle neurons on different body parts. We find that the initial choice of grooming movement is determined by the ratio of sensory inputs to different body parts. In dust-covered flies, sensory inputs change as a result of successful cleaning movements. Simulations from our model suggest that this change results in sequence progression. One possibility is that flies perform frequent comparisons between anterior and posterior sensory inputs, and the changing ratios drive different behavior choices. Alternatively, flies may track the temporal change in sensory input to a given body part to measure cleaning effectiveness. The first hypothesis is supported by our optogenetic competition experiments: iterative spatial comparisons of sensory inputs between body parts is essential for organizing grooming movements in sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.