Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142591›Full record

ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2020

Thermal Decomposition of Ternary Sodium Graphite Intercalation Compounds.

Heather Au, Noelia Rubio, David J Buckley, Cecilia Mattevi, Milo S P Shaffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thermal Decomposition of Ternary Sodium Graphite Intercalation Compounds.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather AuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-2204
Noelia RubioDepartment of Chemistry and Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0386-7123
David J BuckleyNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK.
Cecilia MatteviDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Milo S P ShafferDepartment of Chemistry and Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-9043

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC/EP/K016792/1 and EP/K01658X/1European Flagship No. 696656-GrapheneCore2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) are often used to produce exfoliated or functionalised graphene related materials (GRMs) in a specific solvent. This study explores the formation of the Na-tetrahydrofuran (THF)-GIC and a new ternary system based on dimethylacetamide (DMAc). Detailed comparisons of in situ temperature dependent XRD with TGA-MS and Raman measurements reveal a series of dynamic transformations during heating. Surprisingly, the bulk of the intercalation compound is stable under ambient conditions, trapped between the graphene sheets. The heating process drives a reorganisation of the solvent and Na molecules, then an evaporation of the solvent; however, the solvent loss is arrested by restacking of the graphene layers, leading to trapped solvent bubbles. Eventually, the bubbles rupture, releasing the remaining solvent and creating expanded graphite. These trapped dopants may provide useful property enhancements, but also potentially confound measurements of grafting efficiency in liquid-phase covalent functionalization experiments on 2D materials.

Indexed as

2D materialsexfoliationgraphenegraphite intercalation compoundsX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID32142591
PMCPMC7317426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.