Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142545›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia.

Lotta Gustafsson, Fides Lu, Faith Rickard, Christine MacArthur, Carole Cummins, Ivan Coker, Kebba Mane, Kebba Manneh, Amie Wilson, Semira Manaseki-Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lotta GustafssonUniversity of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Fides LuUniversity of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Faith RickardUniversity of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christine MacArthurInstitute of Applied Health Research: University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Carole CumminsInstitute of Applied Health Research: University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-1944
Ivan CokerBundung Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Banjul, The Gambia.
Kebba ManeBundung Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Banjul, The Gambia.
Kebba MannehKanifing General Hospital, Banjul, The Gambia.
Amie WilsonInstitute of Applied Health Research: University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research: University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5827-8855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity documents at admission to hospitals in The Gambia, and investigate barriers and facilitators to their completion.

methodsWe interviewed 250 women on maternity wards of all 3 Banjul hospitals and conducted content analysis of documentation brought by women on admission for their completeness against WHO referrals criteria. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of the minimum criteria being met. Two focus groups and 21 semi-structured interviews (8 doctors, 8 midwives and 5 nurses) were conducted with healthcare practitioners to explore barriers and facilitators to documented clinical information availability on admission.

findingsOf the women admitted, all but 10/250 (4%) brought either a maternity card or a structured referral sheet. Of all forms of documentation, women most frequently brought the government-issued maternity card (235/250, 94%); 16% of cards had all 9 minimum criteria completed. Of the 79 referred women, 60% carried standardised referral forms. Only 30% of 97 high-risk women had risk-status recorded. Women were less likely to have documents complete if they were illiterate, had not attended three maternity appointments, or lived more than one hour from hospital. During qualitative interviews, three themes were identified: women as agents for transporting information and documents (e.g. remembering to bring maternity cards); role of individual healthcare professionals' actions (e.g. legibility of handwriting); system and organisational culture (e.g. standardised referral guidelines).

conclusionWomen rarely forgot their maternity card, but documents brought at admission were frequently incomplete. This is a missed opportunity to enhance handover and quality of care, especially for high-risk women. National guidelines were recognised by providers as needed for good document keeping and would enhance the women-held maternity documents' contribution to improving both safety and continuity of care.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGambiaHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicLiteracyLogistic ModelsMedical RecordsPregnancyPrenatal CareReferral and ConsultationUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32142545
PMCPMC7059937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.