Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142519›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Enabling animal rabies diagnostic in low-access areas: Sensitivity and specificity of a molecular diagnostic test from cerebral tissue dried on filter paper.

Felana Suzah Rasolonjatovo, Hélène Guis, Malavika Rajeev, Laurent Dacheux, Lalaina Arivony Nomenjanahary, Girard Razafitrimo, Jean Théophile Rafisandrantantsoa, Catherine Cêtre-Sossah, Jean-Michel Heraud, Soa Fy Andriamandimby

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Felana Suzah RasolonjatovoRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Hélène GuisCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-0898
Malavika RajeevDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States of America.
Laurent DacheuxInstitut Pasteur, Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology Unit, National Reference Centre for Rabies, WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Rabies, Paris, France.
Lalaina Arivony NomenjanaharyRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Girard RazafitrimoRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Jean Théophile RafisandrantantsoaRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Catherine Cêtre-SossahASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Michel HeraudRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Soa Fy AndriamandimbyRabies National Reference Laboratory, Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar · MGCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRPrinceton University · USUniversity of Antananarivo · MG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a lethal zoonotic encephalomyelitis that causes an estimated 59,000 human deaths yearly worldwide. Although developing countries of Asia and Africa bear the heaviest burden, surveillance and disease detection in these countries is often hampered by the absence of local laboratories able to diagnose rabies and/or the difficulties of sample shipment from low-access areas to national reference laboratories. Filter papers offer a convenient cost-effective alternative for the sampling, shipment, and storage of biological materials for the diagnosis of many pathogens including rabies virus, yet the properties of diagnostic tests using this support have not been evaluated thoroughly. Sensitivity and specificity of molecular diagnosis of rabies infection using a reverse transcription followed by a hemi-nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-hn-PCR) either directly on brain tissue or using brain tissue dried on filter paper were assessed on 113 suspected field animal samples in comparison to the direct fluorescent antibody test (FAT) recommended by the World Health Organization as one of the reference tests for rabies diagnosis. Impact of the duration of the storage was also evaluated. The sensitivity and the specificity of RT-hn-PCR i) on brain tissue were 96.6% (95% CI: [88.1-99.6]) and 92.7% (95% CI: [82.4-98.0]) respectively and ii) on brain tissue dried on filter paper 100% (95% CI: [93.8-100.0]) and 90.9% (95% CI: [80.0-97.0]) respectively. No loss of sensitivity of RT-hn-PCR on samples of brain tissue dried on filter paper left 7 days at ambient temperature was detected indicating that this method would enable analyzing impregnated filter papers sent to the national reference laboratory at ambient temperature within a 1-week shipment time. It could therefore be an effective alternative to facilitate storage and shipment of samples from low-access areas to enhance and expand rabies surveillance.

Indexed as

AfricaAsiaBrainDesiccationDeveloping CountriesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionRabiesRabies virusReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID32142519
PMCPMC7135319
OpenAlexW3009365336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.