ArticleJCO global oncology2020
Substandard Cisplatin Found While Screening the Quality of Anticancer Drugs From Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemotherapy Medications in Sub-Saharan Africa: Availability, Pricing, Affordability, and Predictors of Quality.JCO global oncology · 2026Article
- Barriers to accessing high-quality cancer medicines in Cameroon. A qualitative study of the views and practices of regulators and frontline healthcare providers.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Substandard anticancer medications in clinical care settings and private pharmacies in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic pharmaceutical investigation.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Article
- Cost-effective track and trace technology for poor-quality chemotherapeutic pharmaceuticals in resource-limited countries: a review of the Chemotherapeutic Paper Analytical Device.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Review
- Analysis of pharmacovigilance databases for spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions related to substandard and falsified medical products: A descriptive study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- A comparative field evaluation of six medicine quality screening devices in Laos.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Challenges of HIV Lymphoma Clinical Trials in Africa: Lessons From the AIDS Malignancy Consortium 068 Study.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA postmarket evaluation of chemotherapy dosage forms in Ethiopia was conducted to test the accuracy of the chemoPAD, a paper analytical device for drug quality screening. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn September of 2018 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 41 anticancer drug dosage forms (representing 4 active ingredients, 5 brands, and 7 lot numbers) were collected and were rapidly screened for quality using a chemotherapy paper analytical device (chemoPAD). Confirmatory analysis via high performance liquid chromatography was conducted.
resultsThe chemoPAD showed that the correct active pharmaceutical ingredient was present in doxorubicin, methotrexate, and oxaliplatin injectable dosage forms. However, 11 of 20 cisplatin samples failed the screening test. Confirmatory assay by high-performance liquid chromatography showed that all 20 cisplatin samples-comprising three lot numbers of a product stated to be Cisteen-were substandard, containing on average 54% ± 6% of the stated cisplatin content. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy analysis of five representative samples found 57% to 71% of the platinum that should have been present. The sensitivity of the chemoPAD for detection of falsified products could not be measured (as none were present in these samples), but the selectivity was 100% (no false positives). The sensitivity for detection of substandard products was 55%, and the selectivity was 100% (no false positives).
conclusionAlthough instrumental analysis by pharmacopeia methods must remain the gold standard for assessing overall drug quality, these methods are time consuming and patients could be exposed to a bad-quality drug while clinical workers wait for testing to be performed. The chemoPAD technology could allow clinicians to check at the point of use for serious problems in the quality of chemotherapy drugs on a weekly or monthly schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.