Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142371›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2020

The PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory: A Platform for Surveillance and Efficient Trials.

Mark J Pletcher, Valy Fontil, Thomas Carton, Kathryn M Shaw, Myra Smith, Sujung Choi, Jonathan Todd, Alanna M Chamberlain, Emily C O'Brien, Madelaine Faulkner and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Mark J PletcherDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.J.P., M.F.), University of California, San Francisco.
Valy FontilDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.J.P., V.F.), University of California, San Francisco.
Thomas CartonDivision of Health Services Research, Louisiana Public Health Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA. (T.C.).
Kathryn M ShawDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (K.M.S., M.S.).
Myra SmithDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (K.M.S., M.S.).
Sujung ChoiDuke Clinical Research Institute, and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (S.C., E.C.O.).
Jonathan ToddOCHIN, Portland, OR (J.T.).
Alanna M ChamberlainDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (A.M.C.).
Emily C O'BrienDuke Clinical Research Institute, and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (S.C., E.C.O.).
Madelaine FaulknerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.J.P., M.F.), University of California, San Francisco.
Carlos Maeztu
Gregory WozniakImproving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL (G.W., M.R.).
Michael RakotzImproving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL (G.W., M.R.).
Christina M ShayCenter for Health Metrics and Evaluation, American Heart Association (C.M.S.).
Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoffDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL (R.M.C.D.).
American Medical Association · USDuke University · USUniversity of Florida Health · USAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy · USAmerican Heart Association · USFaulkner University · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USOchin · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USTulane University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute PACR-2017C2-8153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncontrolled blood pressure (BP) is a leading preventable cause of death that remains common in the US population despite the availability of effective medications. New technology and program innovation has high potential to improve BP but may be expensive and burdensome for patients, clinicians, health systems, and payers and may not produce desired results or reduce existing disparities in BP control. METHODS AND

resultsThe PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory is a platform designed to enable national surveillance and facilitate quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research. The platform uses PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, for engagement of health systems and collection of electronic health record data, and the Eureka Research Platform for eConsent and collection of patient-reported outcomes and mHealth data from wearable devices and smartphones. Three demonstration projects are underway: BP track will conduct national surveillance of BP control and related clinical processes by measuring theory-derived pragmatic BP control metrics using electronic health record data, with a focus on tracking disparities over time; BP MAP will conduct a cluster-randomized trial comparing effectiveness of 2 versions of a BP control quality improvement program; BP Home will conduct an individual patient-level randomized trial comparing effectiveness of smartphone-linked versus standard home BP monitoring. Thus far, BP Track has collected electronic health record data from over 826 000 eligible patients with hypertension who completed ≈3.1 million ambulatory visits. Preliminary results demonstrate substantial room for improvement in BP control (<140/90 mm Hg), which was 58% overall, and in the clinical processes relevant for BP control. For example, only 12% of patients with hypertension with a high BP measurement during an ambulatory visit received an order for a new antihypertensive medication.

conclusionsThe PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory is designed to be a reusable platform for efficient surveillance and comparative effectiveness research; results from demonstration projects are forthcoming.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationTelemedicineAntihypertensive AgentsComparative Effectiveness ResearchData MiningData WarehousingElectronic Health RecordsHumansHypertensionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPopulation SurveillancePredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurequality improvementrandomized controlled trialsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID32142371
PMCPMC10681810
OpenAlexW3010245093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.