Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142136›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2020

Psychosocial Screening in Sickle Cell Disease: Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool.

Steven K Reader, Colleen N Keeler, Fang Fang Chen, Nicole M Ruppe, Diana L Rash-Ellis, Jean R Wadman, Robin E Miller, Anne E Kazak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven K ReaderCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System.
Colleen N KeelerCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System.
Fang Fang ChenCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System.
Nicole M RuppeCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System.
Diana L Rash-EllisNemours Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Nemours Children's Health System.
Jean R WadmanNemours Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Nemours Children's Health System.
Robin E MillerSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University.
Anne E KazakCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System.
Nemours Children's Health System · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

The eye as a window into sickle cell disease morbidityP20GM109021 · NIGMS · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI HILDENBRAND, AIMEE K · 2014 to 2025
$20.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFamilies of youth with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) can face psychosocial adversity including emotional distress, functional impairments, and sociodemographic risk factors. Systematic screening of psychosocial risk can identify families who may benefit from further assessment and evidence-based care. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief caregiver-report screener based on the tri-level Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM).

methodsFindings are presented from the baseline assessment of a longitudinal study validating a Sickle Cell version of the PAT 2.0. Primary caregivers of 136 youth with SCD receiving care through a multidisciplinary SCD clinic in a children's hospital completed the PAT and validation measures. A subset of 25 caregivers completed the PAT a second time within 3-5 weeks.

resultsInternal consistency for the total score was strong (α = .87), and for the subscales was moderate to strong (α  =  .74-.94), with the exception of the Family Structure (α  =  .38), Caregiver Beliefs (α  =  .48), and Stress Reactions (α  =  .56) subscales. Test-retest reliability was also strong (r = .86, p < .001). Moderate to strong correlations with all except two criteria measures provided validation for the total and subscale scores. Validation measures varied significantly across the three levels of the PPPHM.

conclusionsResults provide support for the reliability and validity of the PAT in SCD. Systematic screening with the PAT can help identify families of youth with SCD at risk for psychosocial problems and potentially help connect them to appropriate services.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCaregiversStress, PsychologicalAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentfamiliespediatricpsychosocialrisk screeningSickle Cell Disease

Identifiers

PMID32142136
PMCPMC7182400
OpenAlexW3010296676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.