ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Statistical significance of cluster membership for unsupervised evaluation of cell identities.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing persistent challenges in digital image analysis of cancer tissue: resources developed from a hackathon.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Epithelial and immune transcriptomic characteristics and possible regulatory mechanisms in asthma exacerbation: insights from integrated studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- SURGE: uncovering context-specific genetic-regulation of gene expression from single-cell RNA sequencing using latent-factor models.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Inference after latent variable estimation for single-cell RNA sequencing data.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Multi-omics characteristics of tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer and their exploration of immunotherapy potential.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Selective inference forJournal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2023Article
- FDX1 regulates cellular protein lipoylation through direct binding to LIAS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Graphia: A platform for the graph-based visualisation and analysis of high dimensional data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Saturation variant interpretation using CRISPR prime editing.Nature biotechnology · 2022Article
- Analyzing Spatial Transcriptomics Data Using Giotto.Current protocols · 2022Article
- Tutorial: guidelines for annotating single-cell transcriptomic maps using automated and manual methods.Nature protocols · 2021Review
- Morphological Observations of the Bony Canal Structure of the Eustachian Tube in Elderly Human Cadavers With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Principal Component Analysis.The journal of international advanced otology · 2021Article
- Transcription cofactor GRIP1 differentially affects myeloid cell-driven neuroinflammation and response to IFN-β therapy.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Identifying temporal molecular signatures underlying cardiovascular diseases: A data science platform.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationSingle-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) allows us to dissect transcriptional heterogeneity arising from cellular types, spatio-temporal contexts and environmental stimuli. Transcriptional heterogeneity may reflect phenotypes and molecular signatures that are often unmeasured or unknown a priori. Cell identities of samples derived from heterogeneous subpopulations are then determined by clustering of scRNA-seq data. These cell identities are used in downstream analyses. How can we examine if cell identities are accurately inferred? Unlike external measurements or labels for single cells, using clustering-based cell identities result in spurious signals and false discoveries.
resultsWe introduce non-parametric methods to evaluate cell identities by testing cluster memberships in an unsupervised manner. Diverse simulation studies demonstrate accuracy of the jackstraw test for cluster membership. We propose a posterior probability that a cell should be included in that clustering-based subpopulation. Posterior inclusion probabilities (PIPs) for cluster memberships can be used to select and visualize samples relevant to subpopulations. The proposed methods are applied on three scRNA-seq datasets. First, a mixture of Jurkat and 293T cell lines provides two distinct cellular populations. Second, Cell Hashing yields cell identities corresponding to eight donors which are independently analyzed by the jackstraw. Third, peripheral blood mononuclear cells are used to explore heterogeneous immune populations. The proposed P-values and PIPs lead to probabilistic feature selection of single cells that can be visualized using principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and others. By learning uncertainty in clustering high-dimensional data, the proposed methods enable unsupervised evaluation of cluster membership. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://cran.r-project.org/package=jackstraw. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.