Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142015›Full record

ArticlePain2020

Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cortical spreading depression exclusively through central mechanisms.

Andreia Morais, Tzu-Ting Liu, Tao Qin, Homa Sadhegian, Ilknur Ay, Damla Yagmur, Rosangela Mendes da Silva, David Chung, Bruce Simon, Rubem Guedes and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A narrative review of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  14. Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the cervical vagus nerve in rare primary headaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Novel Migraine Treatments: A ReviewJournal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreia MoraisDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Tzu-Ting LiuInstitute of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tao QinDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Homa SadhegianDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Ilknur AyDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Damla YagmurDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Rosangela Mendes da SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
David ChungDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Bruce SimonelectroCore, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, United States.
Rubem GuedesNational Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Biomedical Science Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Shih-Pin ChenDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shuu-Jiun WangDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jiin-Cherng YenInstitute of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cenk AyataDepartment of Radiology, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation targeting cortical spreading depression in migrane prophylaxisR01NS102969 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AYATA, CENK · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Determinants of Functional Brain Connectivity After Subarachnoid HemorrhageK08NS112601 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHUNG, DAVID YOUNG · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS112601NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and clinical data strongly support vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a novel treatment in migraine. Vagus nerve stimulation acutely suppresses cortical spreading depression (CSD) susceptibility, an experimental model that has been used to screen for migraine therapies. However, mechanisms underlying VNS efficacy on CSD are unknown. Here, we interrogated the central and peripheral mechanisms using VNS delivered either invasively (iVNS) or noninvasively (nVNS) in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Cortical spreading depression susceptibility was evaluated 40 minutes after the stimulation. iVNS elevated the electrical CSD threshold more than 2-fold and decreased KCl-induced CSD frequency by 22% when delivered to intact vagus nerve. Distal vagotomy did not alter iVNS efficacy (2-fold higher threshold and 19% lower frequency in iVNS vs sham). By contrast, proximal vagotomy completely abolished iVNS effect on CSD. Pharmacological blockade of nucleus tractus solitarius, the main relay for vagal afferents, by lidocaine or glutamate receptor antagonist CNQX also prevented CSD suppression by nVNS. Supporting a role for both norepinephrine and serotonin, CSD suppression by nVNS was inhibited by more than 50% after abrogating norepinephrinergic or serotonergic neurotransmission alone using specific neurotoxins; abrogating both completely blocked the nVNS effect. Our results suggest that VNS inhibits CSD through central afferents relaying in nucleus tractus solitarius and projecting to subcortical neuromodulatory centers providing serotonergic and norepinephrinergic innervation to the cortex.

Indexed as

Cortical Spreading DepressionMigraine DisordersVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID32142015
PMCPMC7305968
OpenAlexW3009177268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.