Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141937›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2020

Ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder: selection and contemporary patterns of use.

Nima Almassi, Bernard H Bochner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nima AlmassiUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Bernard H Bochner

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UROLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32CA082088 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Brett Stewart Carver · 1999 to 2026
$7.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA082088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit are the two most commonly utilized urinary diversions among patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Although orthotopic diversion offers several advantages, only 20% of patients nationally receive this diversion, with decreasing utilization over time. The purpose of this article is to review advantages of each diversion type and considerations in patient selection, review trends in diversion utilization and perioperative and functional outcomes, and examine recent studies evaluating methods of optimizing diversion selection and patient satisfaction and outcomes. RECENT

findingsDecreasing utilization of orthotopic diversion has coincided with the increasing utilization of minimally invasive surgical techniques. A multicentre robotic series demonstrated a higher incidence of high-grade complications with intracorporeal diversion, reflecting the learning-curve associated with this technique. Patient satisfaction with urinary diversion is associated with informed decision-making and goal alignment. Ongoing quality of life studies is aiming to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with the selected urinary diversion and may help guide patient counselling. SUMMARY: Given the potential advantages of orthotopic diversion, its decreasing use is a concerning trend. Elucidating patient goals and informed decision-making are critical to patient satisfaction. A patient-centred approach should be used when selecting the type of urinary diversion for a given patient.

Indexed as

Surgically-Created StructuresUrinary Reservoirs, ContinentCystectomyHumansIleumOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Diversion

Identifiers

PMID32141937
PMCPMC8261790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.