Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141933›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Lei Xu, Jeffrey Skidmore, Jianfen Luo, Xiuhua Chao, Ruijie Wang, Haibo Wang, Shuman He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei XuDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jeffrey SkidmoreDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jianfen LuoDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiuhua ChaoDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Ruijie WangDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Haibo WangDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Shuman HeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

NEURAL ENCODING AND AUDITORY PERCEPTION IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERSR01DC016038 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Neural Encoding and Auditory Processing of Electrical Stimulation in Pediatric Cochlear Implant UsersR01DC017846 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2019 to 2024
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016038NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to (1) investigate the effect of pulse polarity on neural response of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve in children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) and children with normal-sized cochlear nerves and (2) compare the size of the pulse polarity effect between these two subject groups.

designThe experimental and control group included 31 children with CND and 31 children with normal-sized cochlear nerves, respectively. For each study participant, evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output (I/O) functions for anodic-leading and cathodic-leading biphasic stimuli were measured at three electrode locations across the electrode array. The dependent variables of interest included the eCAP amplitude measured at the maximum comfortable level of the anodic stimulus, the lowest level that could evoke an eCAP (i.e., the eCAP threshold), the slope of the eCAP I/O function estimated based on linear regression, the negative-peak (i.e., N1) latency of the eCAP, as well as the size of the pulse polarity effect on these eCAP measurements. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to compare the eCAP amplitude, the eCAP threshold, the slope of the eCAP I/O function, and the N1 latency evoked by the anodic-leading stimulus with those measured for the cathodic-leading stimulus for children with CND and children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Generalized linear mixed effect models were also used to compare the size of the pulse polarity effect on the eCAP between these two study groups. The one-tailed Spearman correlation test was used to assess the potential correlation between the pulse phase duration and the difference in N1 latency measured for different pulse polarities.

resultsCompared with children who had normal-sized cochlear nerves, children with CND had reduced eCAP amplitudes, elevated eCAP thresholds, flatter eCAP I/O functions, and prolonged N1 latencies. The anodic-leading stimulus led to higher eCAP amplitudes, lower eCAP thresholds, and shorter N1 latencies than the cathodic-leading stimulus in both study groups. Steeper eCAP I/O functions were recorded for the anodic-leading stimulus than those measured for the cathodic-leading stimulus in children with CND, but not in children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Group differences in the size of the pulse polarity effect on the eCAP amplitude, the eCAP threshold, or the N1 latency were not statistically significant.

conclusionsSimilar to the normal-sized cochlear nerve, the hypoplastic cochlear nerve is more sensitive to the anodic-leading than to the cathodic-leading stimulus. Results of this study do not provide sufficient evidence for proving the idea that the pulse polarity effect can provide an indication for local neural health.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAction PotentialsChildCochlear NerveElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumans

Identifiers

PMID32141933
PMCPMC7879579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.