Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141711›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2020

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a moisture treatment cream containing three critical elements of natural skin moisturization.

David H McDaniel, Jeffrey S Dover, Mitchell Wortzman, Diane B Nelson

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anti-Photoaging Effects of UpcycledInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Glycosaminoglycans: Sweet as Sugar Targets for Topical Skin Anti-Aging.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David H McDanielMcDaniel Institute of Anti-Aging Research, Virginia Beach, VA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-5456
Jeffrey S DoverSkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA.
Mitchell Wortzmanskinbetter science, LLC, Phoenix, AZ.
Diane B Nelsonskinbetter science, LLC, Phoenix, AZ.
Chestnut Hill College · USHampton University · US

Funding

skinbetter science, LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate skin barrier and hydration effects of a new rebalancing moisture treatment (TRMT) and to assess efficacy and tolerability in subjects with photodamaged skin.

methodsIn an epidermal skin model, tissues (n = 5/group) were topically treated with 25 µL of TRMT, 25 µL of a market-leading moisturizer (MLM), or untreated for 60 minutes. Hydration was measured at 0, 15, and 30 minutes. Tissues were harvested for gene expression analysis of markers associated with skin barrier and hydration: Claudin (CLD), Aquaporin (AQP), Hyaluronic Acid Syntheses (HAS), and Hyaluronidase (HYAL). A clinical study evaluated twice-daily application of TRMT, assessing changes in fine lines/wrinkles, brightness, texture, erythema, and tolerability from baseline through week 8. Hydration was measured using electrical impedance.

resultsTRMT and MLM demonstrated significant increases in hydration vs untreated tissue at each timepoint (P < .005), with greater hydration effects observed for TRMT vs MLM. TRMT-treated tissues demonstrated greater expression of CLD, AQP, and HA, and reduced expression of HYAL vs untreated and MLM-treated tissues. Twice-daily application of TRMT demonstrated significant improvements at 2 weeks in fine lines/wrinkles (P < .001), brightness (P < .0001), texture (P < .0004), and hydration (P < .004). At 8 weeks, statistically significant improvements were achieved in all categories.

conclusionIn an epidermal skin model, TRMT demonstrated significant increases in hydration, greater hydration effects, and expression of key markers associated with skin barrier and hydration vs a MLM. Twice-daily application of TRMT was well tolerated and resulted in early, significant improvements in hydration and visible improvements in skin brightness, texture, fine lines/wrinkles, and erythema at 8 weeks.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCosmeceuticalsDrug Administration ScheduleEpidermisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRejuvenationSkin AgingSkin CreamTissue Culture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeWater Loss, InsensibleBiomarkersCosmeceuticalscosmeceuticalhydrationmoisturizingphotoaging of the skinskin barrier

Identifiers

PMID32141711
PMCPMC7217153
OpenAlexW3009081864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.