Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141259›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2020

Efficacy and Safety of a Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler in Older Asthmatics: Comparison to a Dry Powder Inhaler in a 12-Week Randomized Trial.

Seong Dae Woo, Young Min Ye, Youngsoo Lee, So Hee Lee, Yoo Seob Shin, Joo Hun Park, Hyunna Choi, Hyun Young Lee, Hyun Jung Shin, Hae Sim Park

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seong Dae WooDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2506-7407
Young Min YeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-1715
Youngsoo LeeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8918-9353
So Hee LeeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-9434
Yoo Seob ShinDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-3185
Joo Hun ParkDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Hyunna ChoiClinical Trial Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.
Hyun Young LeeClinical Trial Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.
Hyun Jung ShinClinical Trial Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea.
Hae Sim ParkDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. hspark@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-0303
Ajou University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI16C0992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAsthma control in older asthmatics is often less effective, which may be attributed to small airway dysfunction and poor inhalation technique. We compared the efficacy of 2 inhalers (fluticasone propionate/formoterol treatment using a pressurized metered-dose inhaler [p-MDI group] vs. fluticasone propionate/salmeterol treatment using a dry powder inhaler [DPI group]) in older asthmatics.

methodsWe conducted a 12-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-designed trial in older patients (over 55 years old) with moderate-to-severe asthma, and compared the efficacy and safety for asthma control between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses on disease duration and air trapping were performed. Clinical parameters, including changes in lung function parameters, inhaler technique and adherence, were compared with monitoring adverse reactions between the 2 groups.

resultsA total of 68 patients underwent randomization, and 63 (30 in the p-MDI group and 33 in the DPI group) completed this study. The p-MDI group was non-inferior to the DPI group with regard to the rate of well-controlled asthma (53.3% vs. 45.5%,

conclusionThese results suggest that the p-MDI group may be comparable to the DPI group in the management of older asthmatics in aspects of efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

agedairway managementAsthmadry powder inhalersmedication adherencemetered dose inhalers

Identifiers

PMID32141259
PMCPMC7061154
OpenAlexW3006704898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.