Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141041›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Preventing Hospital Readmissions: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on "Impactibility" Beyond EHR 30-Day Readmission Risk Prediction.

Natalie Flaks-Manov, Einav Srulovici, Rina Yahalom, Henia Perry-Mezre, Ran Balicer, Efrat Shadmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LACE Score-Based Risk Management Tool for Long-Term Home Care Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie Flaks-ManovClalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Einav SruloviciClalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel. esrulovici@univ.haifa.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-1291-8284
Rina YahalomHospital Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Henia Perry-MezreHospital Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Ran BalicerClalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Efrat ShadmiClalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredictive models based on electronic health records (EHRs) are used to identify patients at high risk for 30-day hospital readmission. However, these models' ability to accurately detect who could benefit from inclusion in prevention interventions, also termed "perceived impactibility", has yet to be realized.

objectiveWe aimed to explore healthcare providers' perspectives of patient characteristics associated with decisions about which patients should be referred to readmission prevention programs (RPPs) beyond the EHR preadmission readmission detection model (PREADM).

designThis cross-sectional study employed a multi-source mixed-method design, combining EHR data with nurses' and physicians' self-reported surveys from 15 internal medicine units in three general hospitals in Israel between May 2016 and June 2017, using a mini-Delphi approach.

participantsNurses and physicians were asked to provide information about patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized at least one night. MAIN MEASURES: We performed a decision-tree analysis to identify characteristics for consideration when deciding whether a patient should be included in an RPP. KEY

resultsWe collected 817 questionnaires on 435 patients. PREADM score and RPP inclusion were congruent in 65% of patients, whereas 19% had a high PREADM score but were not referred to an RPP, and 16% had a low-medium PREADM score but were referred to an RPP. The decision-tree analysis identified five patient characteristics that were statistically associated with RPP referral: high PREADM score, eligibility for a nursing home, having a condition not under control, need for social-services support, and need for special equipment at home.

conclusionsOur study provides empirical evidence for the partial congruence between classifications of a high PREADM score and perceived impactibility. Findings emphasize the need for additional research to understand the extent to which combining EHR data with provider insights leads to better selection of patients for RPP inclusion.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionPhysiciansCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansIsraelelectronic health recordshigh-risk classificationimpactibilityreadmission prevention

Identifiers

PMID32141041
PMCPMC7210355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.