Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32141017›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2020

Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vincent Vander Poorten, Saartje Uyttebroek, K Thomas Robbins, Juan P Rodrigo, Remco de Bree, Annouschka Laenen, Nabil F Saba, Carlos Suarez, Antti Mäkitie, Alessandra Rinaldo and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of immunonutrition in head and neck cancer surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Intraoperative and postoperative management in endoscopic ear surgery: Perspectives from a worldwide survey.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mapping the risk factors, pathogens, and antibiotic of pharyngocutaneous fistula in patients after neck open surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clindamycin use in head and neck surgery elevates the rate of infections in tracheostomies.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Vincent Vander PoortenOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vincent.vanderpoorten@uzleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-829X
Saartje UyttebroekOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
K Thomas RobbinsDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Juan P RodrigoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annouschka LaenenLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nabil F SabaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carlos SuarezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain.
Antti MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Alessandra RinaldoUniversity of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.
Alfio FerlitoInternational Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.
KU Leuven · BEUniversidad de Oviedo · ESEmory University · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USStatistics Belgium · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal evidence-based prophylactic antibiotic regimen for surgical site infections following major head and neck surgery remains a matter of debate.

methodsMedline, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for the current best evidence. Retrieved manuscripts were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies dealt with patients over 18 years of age that underwent clean-contaminated head and neck surgery (P) and compared the effect of an intervention, perioperative administration of different antibiotic regimens for a variable duration (I), with control groups receiving placebo, another antibiotic regimen, or the same antibiotic for a different postoperative duration (C), on surgical site infection rate as primary outcome (O) (PICO model). A systematic review was performed, and a selected group of trials investigating a similar research question was subjected to a random-effects model meta-analysis.

resultsThirty-nine studies were included in the systematic review. Compared with placebo, cefazolin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and amoxicillin-clavulanate were the most efficient agents. Benzylpenicillin and clindamycin were clearly less effective. Fifteen studies compared short- to long-term prophylaxis; treatment for more than 48 h did not further reduce wound infections. Meta-analysis of five clinical trials including 4336 patients, where clindamycin was compared with ampicillin-sulbactam, implied an increased infection rate for clindamycin-treated patients (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.50-4.97, p = 0.001).

conclusionIn clean-contaminated head and neck surgery, cefazolin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam for 24-48 h after surgery were associated with the highest prevention rate of surgical site infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisClinical Trials as TopicHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansSulbactamSurgical Wound InfectionTime FactorsAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsSulbactamsultamicillinEvidence basedGuidelinesHead and neck oncologyHead and neck surgeryMeta-analysisPerioperative antibioticsProphylaxisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32141017
PMCPMC7140756
OpenAlexW3009311388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.