SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2020
De Novo Secondary Adenocarcinoma in the Colon Used as Urinary Diversion Not in Contact with the Fecal Stream: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary Colonic Adenocarcinoma After Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion a.m. Lundiana-An Aggressive Disease Entity With High Risk of Locally Advanced Disease and Metastases.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted pedicled colonic flap pyeloplasty for the treatment of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction: technique and outcomes from a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Upper Ureteral Reconstruction with a Tapered Descending Colon after Failed Pyeloplasties in a 13-Year-Old Boy.European journal of pediatric surgery reports · 2023Article
- Targeting EGFR sensitizes 5-Fu-resistant colon cancer cells through modification of the lncRNA-FGD5-AS1-miR-330-3p-Hexokinase 2 axis.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA systematic review with a meta-analysis was performed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for secondary de novo adenocarcinoma in the colon used as a urinary diversion not exposed to the fecal stream.
methodsThe systematic review of the literature identified 47 patients with secondary adenocarcinoma in a colonic urinary diversion not exposed to the fecal stream.
resultsThe diagnosis of secondary adenocarcinoma was determined due to the presence major local symptoms and because the cancer in half of the patients was detected at an advanced stage. Diagnosis at an earlier stage was associated with long-term cancer-free survival.
conclusionsThe authors concluded that cystoscopy-colonoscopy screening as suggested by the American Gastroenterology Society for the general population should be applied to patients who have colon urinary diversion not exposed to the fecal stream. For patients with active high-grade inflammation, difficulty with self-catheterization, or symptoms, cystoscopy should be performed earlier. Resection of the tumor at an early stage offers better clinical outcomes with longer survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.