Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140987›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound should be considered as first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work-up for perianal fistulas : The authors reply to the letter: Mathew RP, Patel V, Low G. Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas. Radiol Med 2020;125:155-156.

Antonio Brillantino, Francesca Iacobellis, Alfonso Reginelli, Adolfo Renzi, Roberto Grassi

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio BrillantinoDepartment of Surgery, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Francesca IacobellisDepartment of General and Emergency Radiology, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy. iacobellisf@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-7384
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Adolfo RenziDepartment of Surgery, "Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli" Hospital, Via Manzoni 220, 80123, Naples, Italy.
Roberto GrassiDepartment of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool, showing high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, primary tracks and secondary extension. In the cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MRI may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more accurately detect the fistulas' secondary extensions, and so, to more carefully describe the fistulas' complete anatomy.

Indexed as

EndosonographyRectal FistulaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography3D-EAUSAnal fistulaEndoanal ultrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingPerianal sepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.