Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140967›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Effectiveness of a Multiprofessional, Online and Simulation-Based Difficult Conversations Training Program on Self-Perceived Competence of Oncology Healthcare Provider Trainees.

Christine Tina Papadakos, Tylar Stringer, Janet Papadakos, Jennifer Croke, Anne Embleton, Caitlin Gillan, Kim Miller, Andrea Weiss, Kirsten Wentlandt, Meredith Giuliani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine Tina Papadakos *Department of Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-8810
Tylar Stringer *Department of Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1641-617X
Janet PapadakosDepartment of Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-4156
Jennifer CrokeRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7090-6313
Anne EmbletonPractice Based Education, Collaborative Academic Practice, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Caitlin GillanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1612-7423
Kim MillerDepartment of Supportive Care, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea WeissDepartment of Supportive Care, Division of Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Kirsten WentlandtDepartment of Supportive Care, Division of Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiDepartment of Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. Meredith.Giuliani@rmp.uhn.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1827-5590
University of Toronto · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CACancer Care Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective communication between healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients is important for HCP well-being, patient engagement, and health outcomes. Yet, HCPs do not receive adequate communication skills training and report feeling unprepared for difficult conversations. A needs assessment of 64 cancer HCP trainees in Toronto, Canada, found that a majority of trainees rated themselves with low competency in communication skills to support patients through difficult conversations, while nearly all rated these skills as important to their practice. A blended multiprofessional communications program was developed including online theoretical learning and reflective practice in addition to in-person simulation with standardised patient actors. Since communication skills mastery is highly unlikely to occur at the termination of a single training program, the goal of the program was to stimulate participants' motivational beliefs about difficult conversations communication skills in order to deepen their commitment to learning and mastery. The motivational beliefs assessed included self-efficacy (self-perceived competence), intent to use techniques learned, and confidence in task mastery. After completing the course, participants' self-perceived competence in dealing with difficult conversations significantly increased by an average of 25 points (p < 0.001) on a rating scale of 1-100 (n = 40). Participants' intent to use techniques did not change significantly and remained high with an overall average of 89 points. After the course, participants rated their confidence in mastering techniques learned at an average score of 71 points. Multiprofessional, simulation-based training is an effective way to improve HCP trainees' motivational beliefs around having difficult conversations.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansMedical OncologyBreaking bad newsCommunication trainingCompassionDifficult conversationsEmpathyHealth care providersHealth care traineesHealth literacyIncident disclosureInterprofessionalMotivational beliefsMultiprofessionalPatient-centred carePlain languageResilienceSelf-regulated learningSimulationSPIKES protocolStandardised patient actorsTherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID32140967
OpenAlexW3009636095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.