ArticleOdontology2020
Bone metabolism of the jaw in response to bisphosphonate: a quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy images.
Article in Odontology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effects of bisphosphonate therapy on the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography.Oral radiology · 2025Article
- Maximum and mean standardized uptake values of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw with bone SPECT/CT: comparison of mandibular pathologies, control and temporomandibular joints.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Volumetric analysis of mandibular lesions with SPECT/CT: a pilot clinical study of maximum standardized uptake value.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Analysis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw with bone SPECT/CT: relationship between patient characteristics and maximum standardized uptake value.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Usefulness of Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT for Evaluating Treatment Response in a Patient with Mandibular Osteomyelitis.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the changes in the bone metabolism of the jaw in response to BP treatment, and we used bone SPECT-CT to analyze the site-specific bone metabolism between the jaw and other sites of bone. We compared the changes in the bone metabolism of each part of bone in response to BP treatment by performing a quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy images between patients treated with low-dose BP for osteoporosis (LBP group; n = 17), those treated with high-dose BP for metastatic bone tumor (HBP group; n = 11), and patients with other oral disease who required bone scintigraphy, with no history of BP treatment (control group; n = 40). The study endpoint was the mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of the uptake of Tc-99 m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) in each group. The mean SUVs of the HBP group were significantly lower at the axial bone of the cervical vertebra, thoracic vertebra, sternum, and rib compared to those of the LBP and control groups. The LBP group's mean SUV was significantly higher at the temporal bone, the anodontia part of the alveolar bone in maxilla, the vital teeth part of alveolar bone in the mandible, and the temporomandibular joint. There was no significant difference among the three groups at the mandibular angle and mandibular ramus. Our analyses revealed that the bone metabolism of the jaw and temporal bone in the BP-treated patients was enhanced, and no suppression of bone remodeling in the jaw by BP was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32140951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.