ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Conventional Filtering Versus U-Net Based Models for Pulmonary Nodule Segmentation in CT Images.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- HEE-SegGAN: A holistically-nested edge enhanced GAN for pulmonary nodule segmentation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Optimized deep learning approach for lung cancer detection using flying fox optimization and bidirectional generative adversarial networks.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- EDTNet: A spatial aware attention-based transformer for the pulmonary nodule segmentation.PloS one · 2024Article
- Hybrid healthcare unit recommendation system using computational techniques with lung cancer segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of skeletal muscle using deep learning on low-dose CT images.Global health & medicine · 2023Article
- A Bi-FPN-Based Encoder-Decoder Model for Lung Nodule Image Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications and perspectives.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- A bi-directional deep learning architecture for lung nodule semantic segmentation.The Visual computer · 2022Article
- Pulmonary nodule segmentation based on REMU-Net.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
- Towards Machine Learning-Aided Lung Cancer Clinical Routines: Approaches and Open Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- CXR-RefineDet: Single-Shot Refinement Neural Network for Chest X-Ray Radiograph Based on Multiple Lesions Detection.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Comparative evaluation of conventional and deep learning methods for semi-automated segmentation of pulmonary nodules on CT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- A Genetic Attack Against Machine Learning Classifiers to Steal Biometric Actigraphy Profiles from Health Related Sensor Data.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is considered one of the deadliest diseases in the world. An early and accurate diagnosis aims to promote the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules, which is of vital importance to increase the patients' survival rates. The mentioned characterization is done through a segmentation process, facing several challenges due to the diversity in nodular shape, size, and texture, as well as the presence of adjacent structures. This paper tackles pulmonary nodule segmentation in computed tomography scans proposing three distinct methodologies. First, a conventional approach which applies the Sliding Band Filter (SBF) to estimate the filter's support points, matching the border coordinates. The remaining approaches are Deep Learning based, using the U-Net and a novel network called SegU-Net to achieve the same goal. Their performance is compared, as this work aims to identify the most promising tool to improve nodule characterization. All methodologies used 2653 nodules from the LIDC database, achieving a Dice score of 0.663, 0.830, and 0.823 for the SBF, U-Net and SegU-Net respectively. This way, the U-Net based models yield more identical results to the ground truth reference annotated by specialists, thus being a more reliable approach for the proposed exercise. The novel network revealed similar scores to the U-Net, while at the same time reducing computational cost and improving memory efficiency. Consequently, such study may contribute to the possible implementation of this model in a decision support system, assisting the physicians in establishing a reliable diagnosis of lung pathologies based on this segmentation task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32140870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.