Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140773›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

Matthias Hey, Nicole Neben, Timo Stöver, Uwe Baumann, Alexander Mewes, Tim Liebscher, Mark Schüssler, Antje Aschendorff, Thomas Wesarg, Andreas Büchner and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The effect of surgical complexity on hearing preservation during cochlear implantation with sheathed perimodiolar electrodes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Cochlear implantation with Slim Modiolar Electrode carriers enables hearing preservation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Illness perceptions in cochlear implant users - a longitudinal study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthias HeyKlinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 27, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Nicole NebenCochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 76 A, 30625, Hannover, Germany. nneben@cochlear.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-6305
Timo StöverKlinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Uwe BaumannKlinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Alexander MewesKlinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 27, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Tim LiebscherUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Waldstr. 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Mark SchüsslerDeutsches HörZentrum Hannover der HNO-Klinik der MHH, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Antje AschendorffUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas WesargUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas BüchnerDeutsches HörZentrum Hannover der HNO-Klinik der MHH, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Paula GreenhamGreenham Research Consulting Ltd., Downland House, Ashbury, SN6 8LP, UK.
Ulrich HoppeUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Waldstr. 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores.

methodsData was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

resultsThere was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels.

conclusionsIn a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdultHearingHumansRetrospective StudiesCongenital hearing lossData loggingElderlyHearing aidsPerimodiolarSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID32140773
PMCPMC7198645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.