Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140674›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2020

The survival of patients enrolled in a global direct-to-patient cancer medicine donation program: The Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP).

Chukwuemeka A Umeh, Pat Garcia-Gonzalez, David Tremblay, Richard Laing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Management of CML and Pregnancy in Low-and Middle-income Countries.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chukwuemeka A UmehDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, MA, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Pat Garcia-GonzalezThe Max Foundation, Global Headquarters, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 230 Seattle, WA 98105 USA.
David TremblayNovartis-Oncology, 81 Batson Drive Aurora ON L4G 3R2, Canada.
Richard LaingDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, MA, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP) is a unique direct-to-patient program that provides imatinib (Glivec) at no cost to eligible patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). This paper analyses the output, outcome and impact of the program between 2001 and 2014 using the data collected by the Max Foundation.

methodWe extracted data on GIPAP patients' country of residence, sex, diagnosis, date of enrollment in GIPAP, age at enrollment, case closure date, and reason for closure from The Max Foundation database covering the period 2001 to 2014. We used Kaplan-Meier method to assess the survival rate of patients in GIPAP and used the proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of different variables on patients' survival.

findingsAbout 63,000 GIPAP patients in 93 countries received over 71 million defined daily doses (DDD) of imatinib between 2001 and 2014. Our analysis showed that GIPAP patients had a 5-year survival rate of 89% which compares favorably to survival in high income countries despite the challenges of delivering cancer care in LMICs. Age at enrollment into the program, sex, duration between diagnosis and enrollment into program, year of enrollment, and patients' diagnosis (CML vs non-CML) were factors that influenced survival.

interpretationThe GIPAP program has improved the survival of CML and GIST patients in LMICs, most of whom would not have had access to imatinib in the absence of the donation and therapeutic support of the program.

fundingThis work was funded as part of Access Accelerated case studies. Access Accelerated is an initiative of more than 20 global biopharmaceutical companies in partnership with the World Bank and Union of International Cancer Control that seeks to reduce barriers to prevention, treatment and care for non-communicable diseases in LMICs.

Indexed as

Access observatoryChronic myeloid leukemiaCML survival rateGIPAPGlivec International Patient Assistance ProgramMax foundationNovartis

Identifiers

PMID32140674
PMCPMC7046500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.