Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140571›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2020

User experience and patient satisfaction with tuberculosis care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Danielle Cazabon, Tripti Pande, Paulami Sen, Amrita Daftary, Catherine Arsenault, Himani Bhatnagar, Kate O'Brien, Madhukar Pai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient-reported outcomes in tuberculosis: a qualitative exploration of psychosocial, economic, and treatment-related challenges.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. User Experience of Symptom Checkers: A Systematic Review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Improving the quality of tuberculosis care in the post-pandemic world.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Delay in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in The Gambia, West Africa: A cross-sectional study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  20. A Study on Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction with National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme Services in Ahmedabad, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle CazabonMcGill International TB Center, Montreal, Canada.
Tripti PandeMcGill International TB Center, Montreal, Canada.
Paulami SenMcGill International TB Center, Montreal, Canada.
Amrita DaftarySchool of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Catherine ArsenaultHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Himani BhatnagarMcMaster University, Global Health Program, Hamilton, Canada.
Kate O'BrienWe are TB/National TB Controllers Association, Smryna, USA.
Madhukar PaiMcGill International TB Center, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centered care is at the forefront of the End TB strategy, yet little is known about user (patient's) experience and patient satisfaction with TB services. Our study aims to systematically review quantitative studies evaluating user experience and TB patient satisfaction within the health care system.

methodsFive medical databases were systematically searched between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2018. English studies assessing user experience and patient satisfaction within the healthcare system from a TB patient's perspective in low and middle-income countries, were included.

resultsThirty-five studies from 16 low and middle-income countries evaluated three major themes; facilities and patient centeredness (

conclusionOur study shows large variability in measurement of user experiences and patient satisfaction. Studies reported that patients were mostly satisfied with TB care services, and those that were dissatisfied were substantially more likely to be lost to follow-up. The high satisfaction rates could have been due to lack of education on good quality patient care or fear of losing access to health care. A standardized patient centered tool could be designed to help assess user experience and patient satisfaction to allow comparisons among health systems and countries.

Indexed as

Health systemPatient satisfactionPrivatePublicTuberculosisUser experience

Identifiers

PMID32140571
PMCPMC7044748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.