Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32140502›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2020

Diffusion weighted imaging improves diagnostic ability of MRI for determining complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Anuradha Chandramohan, Umar M Siddiqi, Rohin Mittal, Anu Eapen, Mark R Jesudason, Thomas S Ram, Ashish Singh, Dipti Masih

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuradha ChandramohanDepartment of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Umar M SiddiqiDepartment of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Rohin MittalDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Anu EapenDepartment of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Mark R JesudasonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Thomas S RamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Ashish SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Dipti MasihDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Christian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the diagnostic performance, interobserver agreement and confidence level for determining response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) using morphology based MR-tumour regression grade (MR TRG), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and their combination in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsThis was a retrospective study including patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with NACRT and subsequent surgery. Two independent radiologists blinded to the histopathology reviewed staging and restaging MRI. Diagnostic performance of morphology based MR-TRG, DWI patterns and their combination for determining complete (CR) and incomplete (IR) response was assessed with pathological response as the reference. Likert's scale was used to assess the radiologist's level of confidence. Interobserver agreement was determined using Kappa statistics.

resultsThe study included 251 patients (mean age of 47.9+/-14 (range 19-86) years, M:F = 164:87). Rate of pathological CR was 14.7 % (n = 37). Pattern based interpretation of DWI and combined approach (DWI + T2-HR) had superior diagnostic performance than morphology based assessment alone with area under curve (AUC) for T2HR, DWI and their combination being 0.531, 0.887, 0.874 respectively for observer 1 and 0.558, 0.653, 0.678 respectively for observer 2, p < 0.001. Interobserver agreement was substantial (k = 0.688) for combined approach, moderate (k = 0.402) for DWI patterns and fair (k = 0.265) for T2 HR MRI with both observers exhibiting highest level of confidence for determining response with the combined approach.

conclusionComplete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be determined with excellent accuracy, substantial interobserver agreement and high level of confidence by combined interpretation of DWI and T2 high resolution MRI.

Indexed as

AJCC, American Joint Committee on CancerAUC, area under the curvecCR, clinical complete responseComplete responseDiffusion weighted imagingDWI, diffusion weighted imagingIR, incomplete responseLCCRT, neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapyMERCURY, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Rectal Cancer European Equivalence StudyMRIMR, TRG MR-tumour regression gradeNACRT, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapypCR, pathological complete responsep-TRG, pathological tumour regression gradeRectal cancerT2-HR MRI, T2 high resolution MRI

Identifiers

PMID32140502
PMCPMC7044654
OpenAlexW3008103548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.