ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Long-Term Home-Use of Sensory-Motor-Integrated Bidirectional Bionic Prosthetic Arms Promotes Functional, Perceptual, and Cognitive Changes.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Pooled it
- First-in-human implementation of a bidirectional somatosensory neuroprosthetic system with wireless communication.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Testing silicone digit extensions as a way to suppress natural sensation to evaluate supplementary tactile feedback.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Cutting a nerve of the hand alters the organization of digit maps in primary somatosensory cortex.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Enhanced sensory perception and myoelectric control with high channel count implanted sensorimotor systems.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Restoration of Genuine Sensation and Proprioception of Individual Fingers Following Transradial Amputation with Targeted Sensory Reinnervation as a Mechanoneural Interface.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing neuroprosthesis calibration: the advantage of integrating prior training over exclusive use of new data.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Proprioception: A New Era Set in Motion by Emerging Genetic and Bionic Strategies?Annual review of physiology · 2023Review
- A machine learning approach to quantify individual gait responses to ankle exoskeletons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modulating Brain Activity with Invasive Brain-Computer Interface: A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Embodiment for Robotic Lower-Limb Exoskeletons: A Narrative Review.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023Article
- Combined spatial and frequency encoding for electrotactile feedback of myoelectric signals.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Internet of Things for beyond-the-laboratory prosthetics research.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Article
- Clinical Basis for Creating an Osseointegrated Neural Interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Towards User-Centred Prosthetics Research Beyond the Laboratory.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees.Nature materials · 2021Review
- A compact system for simultaneous stimulation and recording for closed-loop myoelectric control.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- The 2020 Yearbook of Neurorestoratology.Journal of neurorestoratology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous sensation is vital to controlling our hands and upper limbs. It helps close the motor control loop by informing adjustments of grasping forces during object manipulations and provides much of the information the brain requires to perceive our limbs as a part of our bodies. This sensory information is absent to upper-limb prosthesis users. Although robotic prostheses are becoming increasingly sophisticated, the absence of feedback imposes a reliance on open-loop control and limits the functional potential as an integrated part of the body. Experimental systems to restore physiologically relevant sensory information to prosthesis users are beginning to emerge. However, the impact of their long-term use on functional abilities, body image, and neural adaptation processes remains unclear. Understanding these effects is essential to transition sensate prostheses from sophisticated assistive tools to integrated replacement limbs. We recruited three participants with high-level upper-limb amputation who previously received targeted reinnervation surgery. Each participant was fit with a neural-machine-interface prosthesis that allowed participants to operate their device by thinking about moving their missing limb. Additionally, we fit a sensory feedback system that allowed participants to experience touch to the prosthesis as touch on their missing limb. All three participants performed a long-term take-home trial. Two participants used their neural-machine-interface systems with touch feedback and one control participant used his prescribed, insensate prosthesis. A series of functional outcome metrics and psychophysical evaluations were performed using sensate neural-machine-interface prostheses before and after the take-home period to capture changes in functional abilities, limb embodiment, and neural adaptation. Our results demonstrated that the relationship between users and sensate neural-machine-interface prostheses is dynamic and changes with long-term use. The presence of touch sensation had a near-immediate impact on how the users operated their prostheses. In the multiple independent measures of users' functional abilities employed, we observed a spectrum of performance changes following long-term use. Furthermore, after the take-home period, participants more appropriately integrated their prostheses into their body images and psychophysical tests provided strong evidence that neural and cortical adaptation occurred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.