Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32139983›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons

Management of Intussusception in the Era of Ultrasound-Guided Hydrostatic Reduction: A 3-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Mir Fahiem-Ul-Hassan, Gowhar N Mufti, Nisar A Bhat, Aejaz A Baba, Mudassir Buchh, Sajad A Wani, Shahid Banday, Mudassir Magray, Atif Nayeem, Sikandar Iqbal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mir Fahiem-Ul-HassanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Gowhar N MuftiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Nisar A BhatDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Aejaz A BabaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Mudassir BuchhDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sajad A WaniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Shahid BandayDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Mudassir MagrayDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Atif NayeemDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sikandar IqbalDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovernment Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUltrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction (HSR) is currently the initial management tool in the treatment of intussusception. HSR is, however, confronted with failures besides there are still a number of patients who primarily undergo surgical intervention for the management of intussusception. We undertook this study to assess the efficacy of HSR and also to look for factors demanding the surgical exploration in patients with intussusception. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 215 patients with intussusception from June 2014 to June 2017 were prospectively studied. HSR was carried out in 203 patients, which was successful in 187 and unsuccessful in 16. These two groups were compared using the Student's

resultsHSR was successful in 187 and unsuccessful in 16. The failed group was more likely to have symptoms over 24 h, appearance of crescent, and ≥10-cm length on ultrasonography (USG). Two of these patients had ischemic bowel, two had ileoileal intussusception, and eight had pathological lead points, whereas no obvious cause could be identified in the rest of the four patients. Among the 12 patients who were primarily operated, four patients had peritonitis and other four patients were neonates. Laparoscopic reduction was done in four patients.

conclusionHSR is a safe and effective treatment modality for intussusception. However, it is met with higher failure rates in patients with risk factors such as delayed presentation, appearance of crescent on USG, and length >10 cm. The role of HSR is also dubious in situations such as neonatal intussusception, small-bowel intussusception, and multiple intussusceptions and also in preventing the future recurrence. Such patients ought to be managed by laparotomy or where feasible by laparoscopy. Furthermore, before embarking on HSR, peritonitis and bowel ischemia should be ruled out clinically and radiologically. In the suspicious cases of bowel ischemia, USG Doppler may be helpful.

Indexed as

Intussusceptionperitonitisresection anastomosisultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction

Identifiers

PMID32139983
PMCPMC7020677
OpenAlexW3004314025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.