Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32139898›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2020

53BP1 loss rescues embryonic lethality but not genomic instability of BRCA1 total knockout mice.

Jiyuan Chen, Peng Li, Licun Song, Long Bai, Michael S Y Huen, Yidan Liu, Lin-Yu Lu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Assessing the Clinical Relevance ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Repetitive Sequence Stability in Embryonic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. BRCA1 safeguards genome integrity by activating chromosome asynapsis checkpoint to eliminate recombination-defective oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiyuan Chen *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-3348
Peng Li *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Licun SongKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Long BaiKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Michael S Y HuenSchool of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yidan LiuKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. yidanliu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-266X
Lin-Yu LuKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. lulinyu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-6650
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1 is critical for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR). BRCA1 deficient mice are embryonic lethal. Previous studies have shown that 53BP1 knockout (KO) rescues embryonic lethality of BRCA1 hypomorphic mutant mice by restoring HR. Here, we show that 53BP1 KO can partially rescue embryonic lethality of BRCA1 total KO mice, but HR is not restored in BRCA1-53BP1 double knockout (DKO) mice. As a result, BRCA1-53BP1 DKO cells are extremely sensitive to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). In addition to HR deficiency, BRCA1-53BP1 DKO cells have elevated microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) activity and G2/M cell cycle checkpoint defects, causing severe genomic instability in these cells. Interestingly, BRCA1-53BP1 DKO mice rapidly develop thymic lymphoma that is 100% penetrant, which is not observed in any BRCA1 mutant mice rescued by 53BP1 KO. Taken together, our study reveals that 53BP1 KO can partially rescue embryonic lethality caused by complete BRCA1 loss without rescuing HR-related defects. This finding suggests that loss of 53BP1 can support the development of cancers with silenced BRCA1 expression without causing PARPi resistance.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorChromosome AberrationsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairEmbryo LossGene SilencingHomologous RecombinationHumansLymphomaMetaphaseBRCA1 ProteinTrp53bp1 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID32139898
PMCPMC7429965
OpenAlexW3010445083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.