ArticleScientific reports2020
Adapting SureSelect enrichment protocol to the Ion Torrent S5 platform in molecular diagnostics of craniosynostosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel compound heterozygous FAM20C variants cause Raine syndrome - retrospective prenatal diagnosis and literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Genetic Basis of Congenital Vertebral Malformations Through a Stepwise Diagnostic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Intrafamilial Phenotypic Variability of theGenes · 2025Review
- Utility of targeted next generation sequencing for inborn errors of immunity at a tertiary care centre in North India.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Results from Genetic Studies in Patients Affected with Craniosynostosis: Clinical and Molecular Aspects.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Facial Dysostoses.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obtaining reliable and high fidelity next-generation sequencing (NGS) data requires to choose a suitable sequencing platform and a library preparation approach, which both have their inherent assay-specific limitations. Here, we present the results of successful adaptation of SureSelect hybridisation-based target enrichment protocol for the sequencing on the Ion Torrent S5 platform, which is designed to work preferably with amplicon-based panels. In our study, we applied a custom NGS panel to screen a cohort of 16 unrelated patients affected by premature fusion of the cranial sutures, i.e. craniosynostosis (CS). CS occurs either as an isolated malformation or in a syndromic form, representing a genetically heterogeneous and clinically variable group of disorders. The approach presented here allowed us to achieve high quality NGS data and confirmed molecular diagnosis in 19% of cases, reaching the diagnostic yield similar to some of the published research reports. In conclusion, we demonstrated that an alternative enrichment strategy for library preparations can be successfully applied prior to sequencing on the Ion Torrent S5 platform. Also, we proved that the custom NGS panel designed by us represents a useful and effective tool in the molecular diagnostics of patients with CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.