ArticleGut2020
Substantial and sustained improvement of serrated polyp detection after a simple educational intervention: results from a prospective controlled trial.
Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03902899 (The Influence of a Short Training in the Detection Rate of Proximal Serrated Polyps in an Asymptomatic Patient Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Influence of a Short Training in the Detection Rate of Proximal Serrated Polyps in an Asymptomatic Patient Population
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of colonoscopic auxiliary devices in reducing the polyp miss rate: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Improving cold snare polypectomy quality: are online educational interventions sufficient?Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Effect of external evaluation and training on the incomplete resection rate in cold snare polypectomies for colonic lesions <10 mm: a prospective Spanish study (POLIPEVA).Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Interobserver agreement among pathologists in the histopathological diagnosis and classification of colorectal polyps.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Anatomical Distribution and Prevalence of Dysplasia in Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Cohort Study Over Seven Years.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Impact of User's Background Knowledge and Polyp Characteristics in Colonoscopy with Computer-Aided Detection.Gut and liver · 2024Article
- Sessile serrated polyp detection rates after fecal immunochemical test or multitarget stool DNA test: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
- Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) alleviates chemotherapy related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in breast cancer survivors: A pilot study based on resting-state fMRI.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Most large colorectal polyps missed by gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy are sessile serrated lesions.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Narrow band imaging versus white light for detecting sessile serrated lesion: A prospective randomized multicenter study.DEN open · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological Correlates of Dysplastic Sessile Serrated Lesion: A Prospective Cohort Study With a High Detection Rate.Gastro hep advances · 2022Article
- Triglyceride glucose index and Atherogenic index of plasma for predicting colorectal neoplasms in patients without cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Improved detection of adenomas and sessile serrated polyps is maintained with continuous audit of colonoscopy.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSerrated polyps (SPs) are an important cause of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs), which is likely the result of suboptimal SP detection during colonoscopy. We assessed the long-term effect of a simple educational intervention focusing on optimising SP detection.
designAn educational intervention, consisting of two 45 min training sessions (held 3 years apart) on serrated polyp detection, was given to endoscopists from 9 Dutch hospitals. Hundred randomly selected and untrained endoscopists from other hospitals were selected as control group. Our primary outcome measure was the proximal SP detection rate (PSPDR) in trained versus untrained endoscopists who participated in our faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population screening programme.
resultsSeventeen trained and 100 untrained endoscopists were included, who performed 11 305 and 51 039 colonoscopies, respectively. At baseline, PSPDR was equal between the groups (9.3% vs 9.3%). After training, the PSPDR of trained endoscopists gradually increased to 15.6% in 2018. This was significantly higher than the PSPDR of untrained endoscopists, which remained stable around 10% (p=0.018). All below-average (ie, PSPDR ≤6%) endoscopists at baseline improved their PSPDR after training session 1, as did 57% of endoscopists with average PSPDR (6%-12%) at baseline. The second training session further improved the PSPDR in 44% of endoscopists with average PSPDR after the first training.
conclusionA simple educational intervention was associated with substantial long-term improvement of PSPDR in a prospective controlled trial within FIT-based population screening. Widespread implementation of such interventions might be an easy way to improve SP detection, which may ultimately result in fewer PCCRCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03902899.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.