Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32139491›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Distance as a barrier to obstetric care among indigenous women in Panama: a cross-sectional study.

Paloma Acevedo, Sebastian Martinez, Leonardo Pinzon, Emmanuelle Sanchez-Monin, Solis Winters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paloma AcevedoOffice of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Sebastian MartinezOffice of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA SMARTINEZ@iadb.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7651-6674
Leonardo PinzonSocial Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Emmanuelle Sanchez-MoninSocial Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Solis WintersOffice of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assess the relationship between distance to a woman's assigned health clinic and obstetric care utilisation.

designWe employ a cross-sectional study design using baseline data from the evaluation of a conditional cash transfer programme to promote greater utilisation of maternal and infant health services. Data were collected between December 2016 and January 2017.

settingThe study is conducted in Ngäbe Buglé, the largest of Panama's three indigenous territories, where maternal mortality is three times the national average.

participantsWe analyse a representative sample of 1336 indigenous women with a birth in the 12 months prior to the survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes include obstetric care utilisation measures for prenatal, childbirth and postpartum events. Secondary outcomes include reasons for not receiving prenatal care, alarming symptoms, child weight at birth and stillbirths or miscarriages.

resultsCompared with women in closest geographic proximity to a health centre (top quintile, Q1), women who lived farthest from a health centre (bottom quintile, Q5) had significantly lower obstetric care utilisation outcomes for critical prenatal, childbirth and postpartum events. Mothers in Q5 were 36 percentage points less likely to have had at least one prenatal care appointment in a hospital, health centre or clinic compared with mothers in Q1 (p<0.01), and 52 percentage points less likely to attend an institutional first appointment (p<0.01). The gap in institutional delivery and postnatal care between mothers in Q1 and Q5 was about 35 percentage points (p<0.01). All utilisation outcomes were negatively correlated with distance, and differences in obstetric care utilisation persisted even when controlling for household wealth, maternal age and maternal education.

conclusionDistance is an important barrier to obstetric care utilisation, with women in more distant locations suffering significantly lower use of prenatal, childbirth and postpartum care compared with women in closer vicinity to a health establishment. Expanding the supply of healthcare and implementing demand side incentives to promote the use of health services in remote communities are relevant policies to reduce disparities in obstetric care utilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: AEA Registry (RCT ID AEARCTR-0001751).

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndigenous PeoplesPanamaPostnatal CarePoverty AreasPregnancyPrenatal CareStillbirthhealth economicsinternational health servicestropical medicine

Identifiers

PMID32139491
PMCPMC7059489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.