Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32139483›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Does mobile phone instructional video demonstrating sputum expectoration improve the sputum sample quality and quantity in presumptive pulmonary TB cases? Protocol for a prospective pragmatic non-randomised controlled trial in Karnataka state, India.

Siddharudha Shivalli, Amrut Hondappagol, Kibballi Madhukeshwar Akshaya, Abhay Nirgude, Narendra Varun, Raveendra Harohally Ramaiah Reddy, Burugina Nagaraja Sharath

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Siddharudha ShivalliDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK shivalli.bhu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1454-7114
Amrut HondappagolDepartment of Public Health, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Kibballi Madhukeshwar AkshayaDepartment of Community Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Abhay NirgudeDepartment of Community Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Narendra VarunDepartment of Community Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Raveendra Harohally Ramaiah ReddyDepartment of Community Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, India.
Burugina Nagaraja SharathDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, India.
Yenepoya University · INESI - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSputum smear microscopy is the cornerstone of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) in India. Instructions on how to produce a good sputum sample are a part of RNTCP training manuals, but its assessment is not emphasised. Healthcare provider's instruction to expectorate a good sputum sample has limitations. Presumptive TB patients often submit inadequate (in quantity and/or quality) sputum samples, which may result in false-negative results. Objectives of the study are, among the selected RNTCP designated microscopy centres in METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, prospective, non-randomised controlled trial in two pairs of RNTCP Designated Microscopy Centres (located at secondary and primary healthcare facilities) of ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Yenepoya University Ethics Committee, Mangaluru, India, has approved the study protocol (YEC-1/158/2019). It complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, local laws, and the International Council for Harmonization-good clinical practices. Investigators will present the results in scientific forums, publish in a scientific journal, and share with RNTCP officers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019887).

Indexed as

SmartphoneSputumAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansIndiaMulticenter Studies as TopicMycobacterium tuberculosisNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPatient Education as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesTuberculosis, Pulmonaryinstructional videomobile phonepulmonary tuberculosisqualityquantitysputum

Identifiers

PMID32139483
PMCPMC7059491
OpenAlexW3010253116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.