Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32139479›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Change in drink purchases in 16 Australian recreation centres following a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction initiative: an observational study.

Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Liliana Orellana, Kathryn Backholer, Ariana Kurzeme, Alethea Jerebine, Beth Gilham, Alexandra Chung, Anna Peeters

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Healthy Food Service Guidelines for Worksites and Institutions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tara Boelsen-RobinsonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia tara.b@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-3091
Liliana OrellanaBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-4337
Kathryn BackholerGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Ariana KurzemeYMCA Victoria, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Alethea JerebineYMCA Victoria, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-244X
Beth GilhamGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0689-2850
Alexandra ChungSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7121-9534
Anna PeetersGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-9132
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) reduction initiative on customer purchasing patterns, including volume sales of healthy and unhealthy packaged drinks and sales value of all packaged drinks, in a major Australian aquatic and recreation provider, YMCA Victoria.

designProspective

setting16 aquatic and recreation centres in Victoria, Australia.

interventionsThe SSB-reduction initiative aimed to remove all SSBs (excluding sports drinks) and increase healthier drink availability over a 1-year period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Itemised monthly drink sales data were collected for 16 centres, over 4 years (2 years preimplementation, 1 year implementation and 1 year postimplementation). Drinks were classified as 'green' (best choice), 'amber' (choose carefully) or 'red' (limit). Interrupted time series analysis was conducted for each centre to determine the impact on volume sales of 'red' and 'green' drinks, and overall sales value. A novel meta-analysis approach was conducted to estimate the mean changes across centres.

resultsFollowing implementation, volume sales of 'red' drinks reduced by 46.2% across centres (95% CI: -53.2% to -39.2%), 'green' drink volume did not change (0.0%, 95% CI: -13.3% to 13.2%) and total drink sales value decreased by 24.3% (95% CI: -32.0% to -16.6%).

conclusionsThe reduction of SSBs in health-promoting settings such as recreation centres is a feasible, effective public health policy that is likely to be transferable to other high-income countries with similarly unhealthy beverage offerings. However, complementary strategies should be considered to encourage customers to switch to healthier alternatives, particularly when translating policies to organisations with less flexible income streams.

Indexed as

Health PolicySugar-Sweetened BeveragesCommerceConsumer BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisSports and Recreational FacilitiesVictoriainterrupted time series analysisnutrition and dieteticspolicy analysisrecreation centressugar sweetened beverage

Identifiers

PMID32139479
PMCPMC7059533
OpenAlexW3010047322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.