ArticleDiabetes care2020
Multilevel Variation in Diabetes Screening Within an Integrated Health System.
Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic stratification of cardiovascular risk and cardiac remodeling in prediabetes: a multimodal analysis comparing ADA and WHO/IEC diagnostic criteria.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Derivation and Validation of D-RISK: An Electronic Health Record-Driven Risk Score to Detect Undiagnosed Dysglycemia in Clinical Practice.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Diabetes Screening Clinical Decision Support Tool.AJPM focus · 2024Article
- Using the Translating Research into Practice framework to develop a diabetes prevention intervention in primary care: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Improving Diabetes Screening in the Primary Care Clinic.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023Article
- Screening for Prediabetes and Diabetes in a National Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers: An Observational Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Observational
- Use of Real-World Data in Population Science to Improve the Prevention and Care of Diabetes-Related Outcomes.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Alternative type 2 diabetes screening tests may reduce the number of U.S. adults with undiagnosed diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVariation in diabetes screening in clinical practice is poorly described. We examined the interplay of patient, provider, and clinic factors explaining variation in diabetes screening within an integrated health care system in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of primary care patients aged 18-64 years with two or more outpatient visits between 2010 and 2015 and no diagnosis of diabetes according to electronic health record (EHR) data. Hierarchical three-level models were used to evaluate multilevel variation in screening at the patient, provider, and clinic levels across 12 clinics. Diabetes screening was defined by a resulted gold standard screening test.
resultsOf 56,818 patients, 70% completed diabetes screening with a nearly twofold variation across clinics (51-92%;
conclusionsScreening practices vary widely and are only partially explained by patient, provider, and clinic factors available in the EHR. Clinical decision support and system-level interventions are needed to optimize screening practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.