ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
An evaluation of time series summary statistics as features for clinical prediction tasks.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forecasting stress transitions using ecological momentary assessment data and machine learning.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Supervised information gain-based feature selection for multimodal physiological signals in stress prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal data for predictive medicine: algorithmic fusion of clinical data in anesthesiology and intensive care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- An IoT-Enabled Wearable Device for Fetal Movement Detection Using Accelerometer and Gyroscope Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing ALS progression tracking with semi-supervised ALSFRS-R scores estimated from ambient home health monitoring.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Predicting ICU Readmission from Electronic Health Records via BERTopic with Long Short Term Memory Network Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Outpatient Clinical Phenotypes Predictive of First Acute Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Employing Deep-Learning Approach for the Early Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment Transitions through the Analysis of Digital Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Integrating Structured and Unstructured EHR Data for Predicting Mortality by Machine Learning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Dissecting contributions of individual systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria from a prospective algorithm to the prediction and diagnosis of sepsis in a polytrauma cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Vital Measurements of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients as a Predictor of Long COVID: An EHR-based Cohort Study from the RECOVER Program in N3C.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Applying an Improved Stacking Ensemble Model to Predict the Mortality of ICU Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- High-Resolution Digital Phenotypes From Consumer Wearables and Their Applications in Machine Learning of Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Predicting the Mortality of ICU Patients by Topic Model with Machine-Learning Techniques.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Learning Predictive and Interpretable Timeseries Summaries from ICU Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical prediction tasks such as patient mortality, length of hospital stay, and disease diagnosis are highly important in critical care research. The existing studies for clinical prediction mainly used simple summary statistics to summarize information from physiological time series. However, this lack of statistics leads to a lack of information. In addition, using only maximum and minimum statistics to indicate patient features fails to provide an adequate explanation. Few studies have evaluated which summary statistics best represent physiological time series.
methodsIn this paper, we summarize 14 statistics describing the characteristics of physiological time series, including the central tendency, dispersion tendency, and distribution shape. Then, we evaluate the use of summary statistics of physiological time series as features for three clinical prediction tasks. To find the combinations of statistics that yield the best performances under different tasks, we use a cross-validation-based genetic algorithm to approximate the optimal statistical combination.
resultsBy experiments using the EHRs of 6,927 patients, we obtained prediction results based on both single statistics and commonly used combinations of statistics under three clinical prediction tasks. Based on the results of an embedded cross-validation genetic algorithm, we obtained 25 optimal sets of statistical combinations and then tested their prediction results. By comparing the performances of prediction with single statistics and commonly used combinations of statistics with quantitative analyses of the optimal statistical combinations, we found that some statistics play central roles in patient representation and different prediction tasks have certain commonalities.
conclusionThrough an in-depth analysis of the results, we found many practical reference points that can provide guidance for subsequent related research. Statistics that indicate dispersion tendency, such as min, max, and range, are more suitable for length of stay prediction tasks, and they also provide information for short-term mortality prediction. Mean and quantiles that reflect the central tendency of physiological time series are more suitable for mortality and disease prediction. Skewness and kurtosis perform poorly when used separately for prediction but can be used as supplementary statistics to improve the overall prediction effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.