Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138733›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

An evaluation of time series summary statistics as features for clinical prediction tasks.

Chonghui Guo, Menglin Lu, Jingfeng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning Predictive and Interpretable Timeseries Summaries from ICU Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chonghui GuoInstitute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian, 116024, People's Republic of China. dlutguo@dlut.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5155-1297
Menglin LuInstitute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian, 116024, People's Republic of China.
Jingfeng ChenInstitute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian, 116024, People's Republic of China.
Dalian University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical prediction tasks such as patient mortality, length of hospital stay, and disease diagnosis are highly important in critical care research. The existing studies for clinical prediction mainly used simple summary statistics to summarize information from physiological time series. However, this lack of statistics leads to a lack of information. In addition, using only maximum and minimum statistics to indicate patient features fails to provide an adequate explanation. Few studies have evaluated which summary statistics best represent physiological time series.

methodsIn this paper, we summarize 14 statistics describing the characteristics of physiological time series, including the central tendency, dispersion tendency, and distribution shape. Then, we evaluate the use of summary statistics of physiological time series as features for three clinical prediction tasks. To find the combinations of statistics that yield the best performances under different tasks, we use a cross-validation-based genetic algorithm to approximate the optimal statistical combination.

resultsBy experiments using the EHRs of 6,927 patients, we obtained prediction results based on both single statistics and commonly used combinations of statistics under three clinical prediction tasks. Based on the results of an embedded cross-validation genetic algorithm, we obtained 25 optimal sets of statistical combinations and then tested their prediction results. By comparing the performances of prediction with single statistics and commonly used combinations of statistics with quantitative analyses of the optimal statistical combinations, we found that some statistics play central roles in patient representation and different prediction tasks have certain commonalities.

conclusionThrough an in-depth analysis of the results, we found many practical reference points that can provide guidance for subsequent related research. Statistics that indicate dispersion tendency, such as min, max, and range, are more suitable for length of stay prediction tasks, and they also provide information for short-term mortality prediction. Mean and quantiles that reflect the central tendency of physiological time series are more suitable for mortality and disease prediction. Skewness and kurtosis perform poorly when used separately for prediction but can be used as supplementary statistics to improve the overall prediction effect.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsStatistics as TopicAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPrognosisClinical prediction tasksGenetic algorithmPatient representationSummary statistics

Identifiers

PMID32138733
PMCPMC7059727
OpenAlexW3011076252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.