Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138667›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2020

Evidence for a novel overlapping coding sequence in POLG initiated at a CUG start codon.

Yousuf A Khan, Irwin Jungreis, James C Wright, Jonathan M Mudge, Jyoti S Choudhary, Andrew E Firth, Manolis Kellis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biophysical characterization of high-confidence, small human proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yousuf A KhanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Yousuf@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-2796
Irwin JungreisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. ILJungr@csail.mit.edu.
James C WrightFunctional Proteomics, Division of Cancer Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Jonathan M MudgeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Jyoti S ChoudharyBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Andrew E FirthBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Manolis KellisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Broad Institute · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

GENCODE Resource ProjectU41HG007234 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI FLICEK, PAUL · 2013 to 2020
$20.3M
Regulatory Morif Discovery in the Human Genome Using Comparative GenomicsR01HG004037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2007 to 2015
$3.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004037NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007234Wellcome Trust 106207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPOLG, located on nuclear chromosome 15, encodes the DNA polymerase γ(Pol γ). Pol γ is responsible for the replication and repair of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Pol γ is the only DNA polymerase found in mitochondria for most animal cells. Mutations in POLG are the most common single-gene cause of diseases of mitochondria and have been mapped over the coding region of the POLG ORF.

resultsUsing PhyloCSF to survey alternative reading frames, we found a conserved coding signature in an alternative frame in exons 2 and 3 of POLG, herein referred to as ORF-Y that arose de novo in placental mammals. Using the synplot2 program, synonymous site conservation was found among mammals in the region of the POLG ORF that is overlapped by ORF-Y. Ribosome profiling data revealed that ORF-Y is translated and that initiation likely occurs at a CUG codon. Inspection of an alignment of mammalian sequences containing ORF-Y revealed that the CUG codon has a strong initiation context and that a well-conserved predicted RNA stem-loop begins 14 nucleotides downstream. Such features are associated with enhanced initiation at near-cognate non-AUG codons. Reanalysis of the Kim et al. (2014) draft human proteome dataset yielded two unique peptides that map unambiguously to ORF-Y. An additional conserved uORF, herein referred to as ORF-Z, was also found in exon 2 of POLG. Lastly, we surveyed Clinvar variants that are synonymous with respect to the POLG ORF and found that most of these variants cause amino acid changes in ORF-Y or ORF-Z.

conclusionsWe provide evidence for a novel coding sequence, ORF-Y, that overlaps the POLG ORF. Ribosome profiling and mass spectrometry data show that ORF-Y is expressed. PhyloCSF and synplot2 analysis show that ORF-Y is subject to strong purifying selection. An abundance of disease-correlated mutations that map to exons 2 and 3 of POLG but also affect ORF-Y provides potential clinical significance to this finding.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCodon, InitiatorDNA, MitochondrialDNA Polymerase gammaExonsHumansMitochondriaNucleic Acid ConformationOpen Reading FramesRibosomesCodon, InitiatorDNA, MitochondrialDNA Polymerase gammaPOLG protein, humanCUGInitiationMitochondriaPhyloCSFPOLGPolymeraseRibosomeSynonymous site conservationsynplot2

Identifiers

PMID32138667
PMCPMC7059407
OpenAlexW3011735639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.