ArticlemAbs
Analytical characterization of coformulated antibodies as combination therapy.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical Ultracentrifugation for Biopharmaceutical Characterization and Quality Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Delivery devices and container closure systems for co-formulated and co-administered biologics.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- Insights into the structural differences between homo- and heterodimers enriched from a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Fate of Stressed Oligoclonal Antibodies Tracked by Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy: IgG Aggregation Proceeds across the Species Barrier.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Comparative Forced Degradation Study of Anticomplement C5 Biosimilar and Originator Monoclonal Antibodies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimising Monoclonal Antibody Drug Development for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Charge Variants Characterization of Co-Formulated Antibodies by Three-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Stability of Protein Pharmaceuticals: Recent Advances.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Review
- Eco-friendly simultaneous multi-spectrophotometric estimation of the newly approved drug combination of celecoxib and tramadol hydrochloride tablets in its dosage form.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Online Collision-Induced Unfolding of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Glyco-Variants through Direct Hyphenation of Cation Exchange Chromatography with Native Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Identification of Hetero-aggregates in Antibody Co-formulations by Multi-dimensional Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Stability Convergence in Antibody Coformulations.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Improved process intermediate stability through the identification and elimination of reactive glycation residues - a monoclonal antibody case study.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- Stability enhancement in a mAb and Fab coformulation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Advancements in the co-formulation of biologic therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When two therapeutic agents are combined in a single formulation, i.e., coformulated, the quality and safety of the individual agents must be preserved. Here we describe an approach to evaluate the quality attributes of two individual monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), designated mAb-A and mAb-B, in coformulation. The mAbs were fractionated from heat-stressed coformulated drug product (DP) by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Each purified mAb fraction was then compared with mAb-A and mAb-B in their individual formulations from the same drug substance sources used to make the coformulated DP lot, which was subjected to the same stress conditions. Product variants were evaluated and compared by using several analytical tests, including high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC), reducing and nonreducing gel electrophoresis, ion-exchange chromatography, capillary isoelectric focusing, and peptide mapping with mass spectrometry. Intermolecular interactions in coformulated and photostressed DPs were studied by evaluating aggregates fractionated from coformulated DP by HPSEC. Aggregate fractions of coformulated DP contained dimers, but not coaggregates, of mAb-A or mAb-B. Moreover, extensive assays for higher-order structure and biological interactions confirmed that there was no interaction between the two mAb molecules in the coformulation. These results demonstrate that the two coformulated therapeutic mAbs had the same quality attributes as the individually formulated mAb-A and mAb-B, no new quality attributes were formed, and no physicochemical, intermolecular, or biological interactions occurred between the two components. The approach described here can be used to monitor the product quality of other coformulated antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.