Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138591›Full record

ArticlemAbs

Analytical characterization of coformulated antibodies as combination therapy.

Jun Kim, Yoen Joo Kim, Mingyan Cao, Niluka De Mel, Methal Albarghouthi, Kenneth Miller, Jared S Bee, Jihong Wang, Xiangyang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advancements in the co-formulation of biologic therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Jun KimAnalytical Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Yoen Joo KimAnalytical Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Mingyan CaoAnalytical Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Niluka De MelAnalytical Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Methal AlbarghouthiAnalytical Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-8330
Kenneth MillerBiologics Operations, AstraZeneca, Frederick, MD, USA.
Jared S BeeFormulation and Drug Development, REGENXBIO Inc, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jihong WangAnalytical Sciences, Viela Bio, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Xiangyang WangBiopharmaceutical Development and Operations, Viela Bio, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-0218
AstraZeneca (Australia) · AUAnalytical Biosciences (China) · CNAstraZeneca (Japan) · JPCTI BioPharma (Italy) · ITRegenxbio (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When two therapeutic agents are combined in a single formulation, i.e., coformulated, the quality and safety of the individual agents must be preserved. Here we describe an approach to evaluate the quality attributes of two individual monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), designated mAb-A and mAb-B, in coformulation. The mAbs were fractionated from heat-stressed coformulated drug product (DP) by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Each purified mAb fraction was then compared with mAb-A and mAb-B in their individual formulations from the same drug substance sources used to make the coformulated DP lot, which was subjected to the same stress conditions. Product variants were evaluated and compared by using several analytical tests, including high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC), reducing and nonreducing gel electrophoresis, ion-exchange chromatography, capillary isoelectric focusing, and peptide mapping with mass spectrometry. Intermolecular interactions in coformulated and photostressed DPs were studied by evaluating aggregates fractionated from coformulated DP by HPSEC. Aggregate fractions of coformulated DP contained dimers, but not coaggregates, of mAb-A or mAb-B. Moreover, extensive assays for higher-order structure and biological interactions confirmed that there was no interaction between the two mAb molecules in the coformulation. These results demonstrate that the two coformulated therapeutic mAbs had the same quality attributes as the individually formulated mAb-A and mAb-B, no new quality attributes were formed, and no physicochemical, intermolecular, or biological interactions occurred between the two components. The approach described here can be used to monitor the product quality of other coformulated antibodies.

Indexed as

Drug CombinationsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalDrug Combinationscharge variantscoformulated antibodiescombination therapydegradation pathwaysdegradation productsforced degradation studieshigher-order structurehydrophobic interaction chromatographyintermolecular interactionsmonoclonal antibodyphysicochemical interactionspost translational modificationQuality attributessize variants

Identifiers

PMID32138591
PMCPMC7153825
OpenAlexW3010152209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.