Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138307›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Breast Density Notification: An Australian Perspective.

Wendy V Ingman, Bernadette Richards, Jacqueline M Street, Drew Carter, Mary Rickard, Jennifer Stone, Pallave Dasari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Australian Women's Responses to Breast Density Information: A Content Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wendy V IngmanAdelaide Medical School based at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5011, Australia.
Bernadette RichardsLaw School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Jacqueline M StreetSchool of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Drew CarterAdelaide Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Mary RickardFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
Jennifer StoneCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Pallave DasariAdelaide Medical School based at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5011, Australia.

Funding

Hospital Research Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast density, also known as mammographic density, refers to white and bright regions on a mammogram. Breast density can only be assessed by mammogram and is not related to how breasts look or feel. Therefore, women will only know their breast density if they are notified by the radiologist when they have a mammogram. Breast density affects a woman's breast cancer risk and the sensitivity of a screening mammogram to detect cancer. Currently, the position of BreastScreen Australia and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists is to not notify women if they have dense breasts. However, patient advocacy organisations are lobbying for policy change. Whether or not to notify women of their breast density is a complex issue and can be framed within the context of both public health ethics and clinical ethics. Central ethical themes associated with breast density notification are equitable care, patient autonomy in decision-making, trust in health professionals, duty of care by the physician, and uncertainties around evidence relating to measurement and clinical management pathways for women with dense breasts. Legal guidance on this issue must be gained from broad legal principles found in the law of negligence and the test of materiality. We conclude a rigid legal framework for breast density notification in Australia would not be appropriate. Instead, a policy framework should be developed through engagement with all stakeholders to understand and take account of multiple perspectives and the values at stake.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningbreast densityclinical ethicsduty of carehealth policymammogrammammographic density

Identifiers

PMID32138307
PMCPMC7141298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.