Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138283›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Femoral Artery in Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sabato Sorrentino, Phong Nguyen, Nadia Salerno, Alberto Polimeni, Jolanda Sabatino, Angela Makris, Annemarie Hennessy, Gennaro Giustino, Carmen Spaccarotella, Annalisa Mongiardo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in the paediatric population.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Can Ultrasound-Guided in-Plane Puncture Technique Enhance the Precision of Femoral Artery Access? The Randomized PARFEM Trial.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Trial
  5. Ultrasound-guided femoral access in patients with vascular closure devices: a prespecified analysis of the randomised UNIVERSAL trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Six-Step Approach for Optimizing Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hemorrhagic Pelvic Fracture: Review Article.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabato SorrentinoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Phong NguyenCampbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.
Nadia SalernoDivision of Cardiology, Ferrari Hospital, 87012 Castrovillari, Italia.
Alberto PolimeniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-3031
Jolanda SabatinoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-5419
Angela MakrisLiverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Annemarie HennessyCampbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.
Gennaro GiustinoZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Carmen SpaccarotellaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Annalisa MongiardoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Salvatore De RosaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-942X
Craig JuergensLiverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Ciro IndolfiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-6487
Magna Graecia University · ITCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUFerrari (Italy) · ITIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLiverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unclear whether or not ultrasound-guided cannulation (UGC) of the femoral artery is superior to the standard approach (SA) in reducing vascular complications and improving access success.

objectiveWe sought to compare procedural and clinical outcomes of femoral UGC versus SA in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCvI).

methodsWe searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and web sources for randomized trials comparing UGC versus SA. We estimated risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate at the first attempt, while secondary efficacy endpoints were access time and number of attempts. Primary safety endpoints were the rates of vascular complications, while secondary endpoints were major bleeding, as well as access site hematoma, venepuncture, pseudoaneurysms and retroperitoneal hematoma. This meta-analysis has been registered on Centre for Open Science (OSF) (osf.io/fy82e).

resultsSeven trials were included, randomizing 3180 patients to UGC (

conclusionThis study, which included all available data to date, demonstrated that, compared to a standard approach, ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral artery is associated with lower access-related complications and higher efficacy rates. These results could be of great clinical relevance especially in the femoral cannulation of high risk patients.

Indexed as

bleedingfemoral arteryultrasoundvascular complications

Identifiers

PMID32138283
PMCPMC7141204
OpenAlexW3010097824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.