Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32138280›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Influence of Polymer Charge on the Localization and Dark- and Photo-Induced Toxicity of a Potential Type I Photosensitizer in Cancer Cell Models.

Mikael Lindgren, Odrun A Gederaas, Monica Siksjø, Tom A Hansen, Lena Chen, Bastien Mettra, Chantal Andraud, Cyrille Monnereau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikael LindgrenDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Odrun A GederaasDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Monica SiksjøDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Tom A HansenDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Lena ChenLaboratoire de Chimie, CNRS UMR 5182, ENS de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, F-69342 Lyon, France.
Bastien MettraLaboratoire de Chimie, CNRS UMR 5182, ENS de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, F-69342 Lyon, France.
Chantal AndraudLaboratoire de Chimie, CNRS UMR 5182, ENS de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, F-69342 Lyon, France.
Cyrille MonnereauLaboratoire de Chimie, CNRS UMR 5182, ENS de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, F-69342 Lyon, France.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A current trend within photo-dynamic therapy (PDT) is the development of molecular systems targeting hypoxic tumors. Thus, type I PDT sensitizers could here overcome traditional type II molecular systems that rely on the photo-initiated production of toxic singlet oxygen. Here, we investigate the cell localization properties and toxicity of two polymeric anthracene-based fluorescent probes (neutral Ant-PHEA and cationic Ant-PIm). The cell death and DNA damage of Chinese hamster ovary cancer cells (CHO-K1) were characterized as combining PDT, cell survival studies (MTT-assay), and comet assay. Confocal microscopy was utilized on samples incubated together with either DRAQ5, Lyso Tracker Red, or Mito Tracker Deep Red in order to map the localization of the sensitizer into the nucleus and other cell compartments. While Ant-PHEA did not cause significant damage to the cell, Ant-PIm showed increased cell death upon illumination, at the cost of a significant dark toxicity. Both anthracene chromophores localized in cell compartments of the cytosol. Ant-PIm showed a markedly improved selectivity toward lysosomes and mitochondria, two important biological compartments for the cell's survival. None of the two anthracene chromophores showed singlet oxygen formation upon excitation in solvents such as deuterium oxide or methanol. Conclusively, the significant photo-induced cell death that could be observed with Ant-PIm suggests a possible type I PDT mechanism rather than the usual type II mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthracenesCell Line, TumorCricetulusFemaleOvarian NeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPolymersSinglet OxygenanthraceneAnthracenesPhotosensitizing AgentsPolymersSinglet Oxygenanthracenecell localizationCHO-K1 cellsphoto-dynamic therapysinglet oxygen luminescence

Identifiers

PMID32138280
PMCPMC7179247
OpenAlexW3010008764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.