ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Tracking tumor radiotherapy response in vivo with Cherenkov-excited luminescence ink imaging.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy beam tracking by dual-modality injectable fiducial marker for X-ray CT and Cherenkov luminescence imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Review of Cherenkov imaging technology advances in radiotherapy: single-photon-level imaging in high ambient light and radiation backgrounds.Biophotonics discovery · 2024Review
- Maternally transferred mAbs protect neonatal mice from HSV-induced mortality and morbidity.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2022Article
- Light flash and odor during proton beam therapy for pediatric patients: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Light flashes during proton and photon radiotherapy: A multicenter prospective observational study.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity of circulating tumor cell dissemination and lung metastases in a subcutaneous Lewis lung carcinoma model.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Comparing fluorescent contrast agents for fluorescence guided surgery using 3-D cryo-imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study demonstrates remote imaging for in vivo detection of radiation-induced tumor microstructural changes by tracking the diffusive spread of injected intratumor UV excited tattoo ink using Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging (CELI). Micro-liter quantities of luminescent tattoo ink with UV absorption and visible emission were injected at a depth of 2 mm into mouse tumors prior to receiving a high dose treatment of radiation. X-rays from a clinical linear accelerator were used to excite phosphorescent compounds within the tattoo ink through Cherenkov emission. The in vivo phosphorescence was detected using a time-gated intensified CMOS camera immediately after injection, and then again at varying time points after the ink had broken down with the apoptotic tumor cells. Ex vivo tumors were imaged post-mortem using hyperspectral cryo-fluorescence imaging to quantify necrosis and compared to Cherenkov-excited light imaging of diffusive ink spread measured in vivo. Imaging of untreated control mice showed that ink distributions remained constant after four days with less than 3% diffusive spread measured using full width at 20% max. For all mice, in vivo CELI measurements matched within 12% of the values estimated by the high-resolution ex vivo sliced luminescence imaging of the tumors. The tattoo ink spread in treated mice was found to correlate well with the nonperfusion necrotic core volume (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.