Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32135458›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020

Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.

Janie M Lee, Kathryn P Lowry, Jessica E Cott Chubiz, J Shannon Swan, Tina Motazedi, Elkan F Halpern, Anna N A Tosteson, G Scott Gazelle, Karen Donelan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening-The Polish Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Cancer Fear Among Mexican American Women in the United States.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Janie M LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathryn P LowryDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: kplowry@uw.edu.
Jessica E Cott ChubizWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Shannon SwanInstitute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tina MotazediDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Elkan F HalpernInstitute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna N A TostesonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
G Scott GazelleInstitute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Karen DonelanMongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Breast MRI for High-Risk ScreeningK07CA128816 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEE, JANIE M · 2008 to 2012
$713k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA128816NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe impact of mammography screening recall on quality-of-life (QOL) has been studied in women at average risk for breast cancer, but it is unknown whether these effects differ by breast cancer risk level. We used a vignette-based survey to evaluate how women across the spectrum of breast cancer risk perceive the experience of screening recall.

methodsWomen participating in mammography or breast MRI screening were recruited to complete a vignette-based survey. Using a numerical rating scale (0-100), women rated QOL for hypothetical scenarios of screening recall, both before and after benign results were known. Lifetime breast cancer risk was calculated using Gail and BRCAPRO risk models. Risk perception, trait anxiety, and breast cancer worry were assessed using validated instruments.

resultsThe final study cohort included 162 women at low (n = 43, 26%), intermediate (n = 66, 41%), and high-risk (n = 53, 33%). Actual breast cancer risk was not a predictor of QOL for any of the presented scenarios. Across all risk levels, QOL ratings were significantly lower for the period during diagnostic uncertainty compared to after benign results were known (p < 0.05). In multivariable regression analyses, breast cancer worry was a significant predictor of decreased QoL for all screening scenarios while awaiting results, including scenarios with non-invasive imaging alone or with biopsy. High trait anxiety and family history predicted lower QOL scores after receipt of benign test results (p < 0.05).

conclusionsWomen with high trait anxiety and family history may particularly benefit from discussions about the risk of recall when choosing a screening regimen.

Indexed as

AnxietyFalse Positive ReactionsQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMammographyMassachusettsMiddle AgedRisk

Identifiers

PMID32135458
PMCPMC7375679
OpenAlexW3005675854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.