Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32135156›Full record

ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2020

Influence of nonprotective autophagy and the autophagic switch on sensitivity to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Nipa H Patel, Jingwen Xu, Tareq Saleh, Yingliang Wu, Santiago Lima, David A Gewirtz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Triangular Relationship between p53, Autophagy, and Chemotherapy Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nipa H PatelDepartments of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Medicine and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jingwen XuSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Tareq SalehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Yingliang WuSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Santiago LimaDepartment of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
David A GewirtzDepartments of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Medicine and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: david.gewirtz@vcuhealth.org.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNHashemite University · JO

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While therapy-induced autophagy is conventionally conceived to be cytoprotective in nature, previous studies have identified multiple functions of autophagy, including a nonprotective form, as well as the existence of a switch between the different forms of autophagy. The current work provides further evidence of an autophagic switch, in this case in response to the antitumor drug, cisplatin, in non-small cell lung cancer cells that are either wild-type (p53wt) or functionally null in p53 (crp53), the latter generated using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of autophagy identified nonprotective autophagy in p53wt cells and cytoprotective autophagy in crp53 cells. Furthermore, differences in cisplatin sensitivity between the two cell lines proved to be largely a function of the nature of the autophagy. Specifically, autophagy inhibition in the crp53 cells converts the temporal profile for the loss of cell viability in response to cisplatin to essentially parallel that observed in the p53wt cells. This enhanced sensitivity is due to cisplatin-induced apoptosis that occurs without necessitating the restoration of functional p53. In contrast, inhibition of autophagy has no observable impact on the temporal response profile exhibited in response to cisplatin in the p53wt cells, or the extent of cisplatin-induced apoptosis in the p53wt cells, consistent with the functional definition of nonprotective autophagy. Taken together, our current studies provide evidence that nonprotective autophagy in p53wt non-small cell lung cancer cells can be "switched" to protective autophagy in isogenic crp53 cells, and furthermore that inhibition of cytoprotective autophagy is sufficient to restore cisplatin sensitivity in the crp53 cells, largely through the increased promotion of apoptosis, despite the absence of functional p53.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAutophagyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHEK293 CellsHumansLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinAutophagic switchAutophagyCisplatinDrug resistanceDrug sensitivityLung cancerP53Therapy-induced autophagy

Identifiers

PMID32135156
PMCPMC8127333
OpenAlexW3010257709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.