Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32135011›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Genetic and Genomic Advances in Developmental Models: Applications for Nutrition Research.

Winyoo Chowanadisai, Matthew D Hart, Morgan D Strong, David M Graham, Robert B Rucker, Brenda J Smith, Carl L Keen, Mark A Messerli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Winyoo ChowanadisaiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Matthew D HartDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Morgan D StrongDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
David M GrahamDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Robert B RuckerDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Brenda J SmithDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Carl L KeenDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Mark A MesserliDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
Oklahoma State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USSouth Dakota State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing appreciation that dietary components influence and interact with genes important to metabolism. How such influences impact developmental regulation and programming or risks of chronic diseases remains unclear. Nutrition is recognized to affect development and chronic diseases, but our understanding about how genes essential to nutrient metabolism regulate development and impact risks of these diseases remains unclear. Historically, mammalian models, especially rodents such as rats and mice, have been the primary models used for nutrition and developmental nutrition science, although their complexity and relatively slow rate of development often compromise rapid progress in resolving fundamental, genetic-related questions. Accordingly, the objective of this review is to highlight the opportunities for developmental models in the context of uncovering the function of gene products that are relevant to human nutrition and provide the scientific bases for these opportunities. We present recent studies in zebrafish related to obesity as applications of developmental models in nutritional science. Although the control of external factors and dependent variables, such as nutrition, can be a challenge, suggestions for standardizations related to diet are made to improve consistency in findings between laboratories. The review also highlights the need for standardized diets across different developmental models, which could improve consistency in findings across laboratories. Alternative and developmental animal models have advantages and largely untapped potential for the advancement of nutrigenomics and nutritionally relevant research areas.

Indexed as

NutrigenomicsZebrafishAnimalsDietGenomicsHumansMiceNutritional StatusRatscomparative genomicsdietgeneticsmutationnutrigenomicsobesitypolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID32135011
PMCPMC7360451
OpenAlexW3010119068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.