Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32134988›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Induction of competent cells for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated stable transformation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Guo-Qing Song, Xue Han, Andrew T Wiersma, Xiaojuan Zong, Halima E Awale, James D Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biofortification of common bean (Food and energy security · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guo-Qing SongPlant Biotechnology Resource & Outreach Center, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United Sates of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-9884
Xue HanPlant Biotechnology Resource & Outreach Center, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United Sates of America.
Andrew T WiersmaDepartment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Xiaojuan ZongPlant Biotechnology Resource & Outreach Center, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United Sates of America.
Halima E AwaleDepartment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
James D KellyDepartment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable transformation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has been successful, to date, only using biolistic-mediated transformation and shoot regeneration from meristem-containing embryo axes. In this study, using precultured embryo axes, and optimal co-cultivation conditions resulted in a successful transformation of the common bean cultivar Olathe using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis was attained through the preculture of embryo axes for 12 weeks using induced competent cells for A. tumefaciens-mediated gene delivery. Using A. tumefaciens at a low optical density (OD) of 0.1 at a wavelength of 600 nm for infection and 4-day co-cultivation, compared to OD600 of 0.5, increased the survival rate of the inoculated explants from 23% to 45%. Selection using 0.5 mg L-1 glufosinate (GS) was effective to identify transformed cells when the bialaphos resistance (bar) gene under the constitutive 35S promoter was used as a selectable marker. After an 18-week selection period, 1.5% -2.5% inoculated explants, in three experiments with a total of 600 explants, produced GS-resistant plants through somatic embryogenesis. The expression of bar was confirmed in first- and second-generation seedlings of the two lines through reverse polymerase chain reaction. Presence of the bar gene was verified through genome sequencing of two selected transgenic lines. The induction of regenerable, competent cells is key for the successful transformation, and the protocols described may be useful for future transformation of additional Phaseolus germplasm.

Indexed as

Transformation, GeneticAgrobacterium tumefaciensAminobutyratesDNA, PlantDrug Resistance, BacterialGenetic VectorsHerbicidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsPhaseolusPhenotypePlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA, PlantAminobutyratesbialaphosDNA, PlantHerbicidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsphosphinothricinRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID32134988
PMCPMC7058285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.