Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32134940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Important citation identification by exploiting content and section-wise in-text citation count.

Shahzad Nazir, Muhammad Asif, Shahbaz Ahmad, Faisal Bukhari, Muhammad Tanvir Afzal, Hanan Aljuaid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Bibliometric Analysis of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shahzad NazirDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AsifDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-2527
Shahbaz AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-4521
Faisal BukhariPunjab University College of Information Technology (PUCIT), University of the Punjab (PU), Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-9742
Muhammad Tanvir AfzalDepartment of Computer Science, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9765-8815
Hanan AljuaidDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6042-0283
National Textile University · PKCapital University of Science and Technology · PKPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A citation is deemed as a potential parameter to determine linkage between research articles. The parameter has extensively been employed to form multifarious academic aspects like calculating the impact factor of journals, h-Index of researchers, allocate different research grants, find the latest research trends, etc. The current state-of-the-art contends that all citations are not of equal importance. Based on this argument, the current trend in citation classification community categorizes citations into important and non-important reasons. The community has proposed different approaches to extract important citations such as citation count, context-based, metadata, and textual based approaches. The contemporary state-of-the-art in citation classification community ignores significantly potential features that can play a vital role in citation classification. This research presents a novel approach for binary citation classification by exploiting section-wise in-text citation frequencies, similarity score, and overall citation count-based features. The study also introduces machine learning algorithms based novel approach for assigning appropriate weights to the logical sections of research papers. The weights are allocated to the citations with respect to their sections. To perform the classification, we used three classification techniques, Support Vector Machine, Kernel Linear Regression, and Random Forest. The experiment was performed on two annotated benchmark datasets that contain 465 and 311 citation pairs of research articles respectively. The results revealed that the proposed approach attained an improved value of precision (i.e., 0.84 vs 0.72) from contemporary state-of-the-art approach.

Indexed as

Journal Impact FactorHumansLinear ModelsMetadataPeriodicals as TopicSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID32134940
PMCPMC7058319
OpenAlexW3009817544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.