Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32134123›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2020

Transfusion-associated adverse events and implementation of blood safety measures - findings from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Alexandra A Savinkina, Kathryn A Haass, Mathew R P Sapiano, Richard A Henry, James J Berger, Sridhar V Basavaraju, Jefferson M Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. CD71Scandinavian journal of immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. History matters: Preventing severe allergic transfusion reactions.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The use of premedications for platelet transfusions in pediatric patients.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra A SavinkinaDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kathryn A HaassDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-0397-986X
Mathew R P SapianoDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-6683
Richard A HenryOffice of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia.
James J BergerOffice of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sridhar V BasavarajuDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jefferson M JonesDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-9058
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Health · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerious transfusion-associated adverse events are rare in the United States. To enhance blood safety, various measures have been developed. With use of data from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS), we describe the rate of transfusion-associated adverse events and the implementation of specific blood safety measures. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsData from the 2017 NBCUS were used with comparison to already published estimates from 2015. Survey weighting and imputation were used to obtain national estimates of transfusion-associated adverse events, and the number of units treated with pathogen reduction technology (PRT), screened for Babesia, and leukoreduced.

resultsThe rate of transfusion-associated adverse events requiring any diagnostic or therapeutic interventions was stable (275 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2015 and 282 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2017). In 2017 among US blood collection centers, 16 of 141 (11.3%) reported screening units for Babesia and 28 of 144 (19.4%) reported PRT implementation; 138 of 2279 (6.1%) hospitals reported transfusing PRT-treated platelets. In 2017, 134 of 2336 (5.7%) hospitals reported performing secondary bacterial testing of platelets (50,922 culture-based and 63,220 rapid immunoassay tests); in 2015, 71 of 1877 (3.8%) hospitals performed secondary testing (87,155 culture-based and 21,779 rapid immunoassay tests). Nearly all whole blood/red blood cell units and platelet units were leukoreduced.

conclusionsBesides leukoreduction, implementation of most blood safety measures reported in this study remains low. Nationally, hospitals might be shifting from culture-based secondary bacterial testing to rapid immunoassays.

Indexed as

Blood BanksBlood Component RemovalBlood PlateletsBlood SafetyErythrocytesGenotypeHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTransfusion ReactionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32134123
PMCPMC7908682
OpenAlexW3009106703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.