Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32133754›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics & gerontology international2020

Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: A scoping review.

Nicholas V Resciniti, Weizhou Tang, Masroora Tabassum, Joseph Lee Pearson, Sharon Melinda Spencer, Matthew C Lohman, Diane K Ehlers, Dana Al-Hasan, Maggi C Miller, Ana Teixeira and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas V RescinitiOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Weizhou TangOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Masroora TabassumDepartment of Health Services Policy & Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Joseph Lee PearsonDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Sharon Melinda SpencerOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Matthew C LohmanOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Diane K EhlersOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Dana Al-HasanOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Maggi C MillerOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Ana TeixeiraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Daniela B FriedmanOffice for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-093X
University of South Carolina · USSouth Carolina Department of Education · US

Funding

Faith, Activity, and Nutrition: Dissemination in Underserved CommunitiesU48DP005000 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2014 to 2019
$5.9M
Carolina Center on Alzheimer's Disease and Minority Research (CCADMR)P30AG059294 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIEDMAN, DANIELA B., LEVKOFF, SUE E · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
ACL HHS U48DP005000Alzheimer's Foundation of AmericaArnold School of Public Health Graduate Scholar in Aging AwardCDC HHS U48/DP005000-01S7NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increase in our older adult population, there is a need for dementia training for informal and formal dementia caregivers. The objective of this scoping study is to assess dementia knowledge instruments utilized in educational programs and interventions intended for formal and informal dementia caregivers. Scoping review methodology was used to search PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science with tailored database search terms. The search yielded 8101 results, with 35 studies meeting inclusion. Studies were conducted in eight countries, had varying study designs (randomized controlled trials [RCTs] = 9, non-RCTs = 6, one-group study design = 20) and utilized previously published (19) and author developed (16) instruments. Furthermore, the studies were internationally diverse, conducted in the United States (n = 18), Australia (n = 7), UK (n = 3), China (n = 2), Canada (n = 2), Taiwan (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1) and multi-country (n = 1). Only two studies focused on minority populations. While author-developed instruments may be more relevant and timesaving, studies should strive to validate instruments or use previously published instruments to help standardize findings across studies and understand better the effects of educational programs on caregiver knowledge. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 397-413.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumanscaregiversdementiaevaluationinstrumentsknowledge

Identifiers

PMID32133754
PMCPMC7748382
OpenAlexW3009140691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.