Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32133459›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes and clinical research2019

Cut-off Value of Random Blood Glucose among Asian Indians for Preliminary Screening of Persons with Prediabetes and Undetected Type 2 Diabetes Defined by the Glycosylated Haemoglobin Criteria.

Priscilla Susairaj, Chamukuttan Snehalatha, Arun Raghavan, Arun Nanditha, Ramachandran Vinitha, Krishnamoorthy Satheesh, Desmond G Johnston, Nicholas J Wareham, Ambady Ramachandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biochemical and Molecular Markers Among Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prediabetes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of the Community-based SPARSH Program on Control of Selected NCDs: Mixed Methods Evaluation.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priscilla SusairajIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Chamukuttan SnehalathaIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Arun RaghavanIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Arun NandithaIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Ramachandran VinithaIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Krishnamoorthy SatheeshIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Desmond G JohnstonFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Nicholas J WarehamMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, UK.
Ambady RamachandranIndia Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe increased morbidity and mortality due to type 2 diabetes can be partly due to its delayed diagnosis. In developing countries, the cost and unavailability of conventional screening methods can be a setback. Use of random blood glucose (RBG) may be beneficial in testing large numbers at a low cost and in a short time in identifying persons at risk of developing diabetes. In this analysis, we aim to derive the values of RBG corresponding to the cut-off values of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) used to define prediabetes and diabetes.

methodsBased on their risk profile of developing diabetes, a total of 2835 individuals were screened for a large diabetes prevention study. They were subjected to HbA1c testing to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes. Random capillary blood glucose was also performed. Correlation of RBG with HbA1c was computed using multiple linear regression equation. The optimal cut-off value for RBG corresponding to HbA1c value of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol), and ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) were computed using the receiver operating curve (ROC). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed from the area under the curve (AUC) and by using the Youden's index.

resultsRBG showed significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.40, p<0.0001). Using the ROC analysis, a RBG cut-off value of 140.5 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) corresponding to an HbA1c value of 6.5% (48mmol/mol) was derived. A cut-off value could not be derived for HbA1c of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) since the specificity and sensitivity for identifying prediabetes were low.

conclusionUse of a capillary RBG value was found to be a simple procedure. The derived RBG cut-off value will aid in identifying people with undiagnosed diabetes. This preliminary screening will reduce the number to undergo more cumbersome and invasive diagnostic testing.

Indexed as

Glycosylated hemoglobinPrediabetesRandom blood glucoseScreening for diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32133459
PMCPMC7056354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.